- Reading time: 2 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 17th September 2026
- Word count: 603 words
- File format: Text
Personal statement example
My interest in landscape planning began with a question I could investigate cheaply: why do people walk where they walk? On the estate where I grew up, the adopted paths run at right angles between blocks, but the worn lines across the grass tell a different story. For my undergraduate dissertation in Geography I surveyed those desire lines across four seasons, photographing them from fixed points, measuring widths with a tape, and interviewing twenty-three residents about which routes they avoided after dark. The findings were modest but clear: the most used informal routes led to the bus stop and the primary school, and the least used official path was the one hemmed in by high shrub planting. It taught me that landscape decisions made decades ago are still shaping daily journeys, and that the evidence is usually there in the ground if someone bothers to record it.
That project pushed me towards planning rather than pure geography. I wanted to understand not only how landscapes are used but how they are decided: who consults whom, how green infrastructure is written into local plans, and why so many good intentions stop at the boundary of a site. Reading Ian McHarg's Design with Nature during my second year gave me the idea of layered constraints and opportunities rather than blank sites, and Jan Gehl's work on public space sharpened my attention to the small dimensions that decide whether a route feels usable. I have also been following local plan consultations in my own borough, and I was struck by how much of the green space argument turns on categories, whether a piece of land counts as amenity, buffer, or simply gap.
Since graduating I have kept the practical side going at low cost. I taught myself QGIS using Ordnance Survey open data and Environment Agency flood mapping, and I have been building a simple record of one two-kilometre road corridor near my flat: verge widths, mowing cycles I can observe, tree species and their condition, where surface water pools after rain. It is not a professional survey, but a year of monthly photographs has shown me how much the character of a street depends on maintenance regimes rather than design drawings. Volunteering with a river clean-up group has added another perspective, we pull the same shopping trolleys out of the same shallow bend each spring, and the group's discussions about bank planting and access points have shown me how much local knowledge exists outside formal consultation.
My job as a customer adviser for a bus operator is not obviously related, but it has been useful preparation. I spend my shifts explaining route changes to people who know their neighbourhood far better than any map suggests, and I have learned to listen for the specific objection behind a general complaint. I also handle the depot's weekly reporting, which has made me careful with data and comfortable presenting it plainly. Working shifts while studying part-time for a GIS short course has taught me to plan my weeks properly.
A master's in landscape planning would give me the design literacy, ecological grounding and policy knowledge I currently lack, particularly in landscape character assessment and green infrastructure strategy. In the longer term I would like to work for a local authority or a consultancy on strategic green space planning in outer urban areas, where the landscape is often treated as leftover space rather than as structure. I am applying now because I have taken this as far as curiosity and open data allow, and I want to learn to do it properly.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a strong, coherent taught master's statement built from modest, well-observed evidence. Your dissertation, self-directed QGIS work and bus job all connect to how people use and decide landscapes, and the reflection is genuine rather than generic. The main gaps are limited discussion of method or analysis and a closing paragraph whose future aims could be slightly more developed.
Subject motivation
why do people walk where they walk?
Opening with a question you could actually investigate makes your motivation concrete rather than declared. The later shift towards planning, wanting to know how landscapes are decided, gives a clear reason for this subject over geography, which strengthens the logic of the application.
Academic preparation
Reading Ian McHarg's Design with Nature during my second year
McHarg and Gehl are used with a specific takeaway each, layered constraints and small dimensions, which shows engaged reading. You could go further by briefly noting a limitation or tension in one of them, demonstrating the critical stance expected at postgraduate level.
Evidence and reflection
the least used official path was the one hemmed in by high shrub planting
This is a precise finding, and you reflect sensibly on what it means. However, you describe data collection more than analysis. A sentence on how you interpreted the interviews or handled the limits of twenty-three residents would show methodological awareness.
Relevant experience
listen for the specific objection behind a general complaint
You turn an ordinary customer job into credible preparation for consultation work, which is exactly how such experience should be used. The river clean-up and corridor survey add sustained, low-cost practice. The final point about planning your weeks is weaker and more generic than the rest.
Credibility and voice
It is not a professional survey
Candid qualifications like this make your claims trustworthy and match your stage. The voice is measured, observant and personal throughout. The detail about the same trolleys in the same bend is memorable without straining for effect.
Structure and format
I have taken this as far as curiosity and open data allow
The paragraphs progress logically from origin to reading, practice, work and aims, and the closing line is economical. The second paragraph's point about land categories ends abruptly. Also check punctuation: the volunteering sentence joins two clauses with a comma splice.
What you’ve done well
- The dissertation is described with concrete methods and a clear, modest finding that directly motivates the move to planning.
- Your bus adviser role is linked convincingly to consultation and local knowledge rather than listed as a generic skill.
- Honest framing of self-directed work keeps every claim plausible and grounded.
How this draft could improve
- Add one or two sentences on how you analysed your dissertation data and what its limitations were, to show readiness for advanced methods.
- Develop the land-categories observation into a question you hope to explore on the course.
- Replace the generic time-management sentence with something more specific, and fix the comma splice in the volunteering sentence.