PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Law and legal studies » Public and specialist law » Employment law postgraduate personal statement example

Employment law postgraduate personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 606 words
  • File format: Text

Personal statement example

My interest in employment law began with a question I could not answer at work. I have spent four years on the tills and in the café of a garden centre, and when a new rota system arrived, several colleagues on variable hours wanted to know whether they could refuse shifts offered at short notice. I looked it up properly, found the government guidance on zero-hours arrangements, and realised that the legal position depended less on the label on the contract than on how the relationship actually worked in practice. That gap between paperwork and reality has shaped everything I have studied since.

My LLB gave me the grounding I needed. The labour law module was the first time I saw how statutory rights, common law contract principles and collective structures interact, and I was struck by how much turns on employment status. For my final-year research project I examined how tribunals have approached status in the gig economy, focusing on the reasoning in Uber BV v Aslam and on the statutory definition of a worker in section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Reading tribunal and appellate judgments closely taught me to pay attention to findings of fact: the same contractual clause can point in opposite directions depending on the degree of control and the reality of substitution. I received a strong mark for the project and, more usefully, came away with a clearer sense of the questions I still want to pursue, particularly how enforcement works for people who are unlikely ever to bring a claim.

Alongside my degree I helped with administration for the university law clinic, logging enquiries and preparing files for the supervising solicitors. I was not advising anyone, but I read enough intake forms to see the pattern: unpaid wages, unclear notice periods, people unsure whether they had been dismissed or had resigned. It confirmed that the most common employment problems are often not doctrinally complex; they are problems of evidence, time limits and confidence. That has made me interested in the procedural side of the subject as well as the substantive law.

My customer-facing work has been a genuine part of my preparation. Busy weekends taught me to stay calm with people who are frustrated, to explain a refund policy without sounding defensive, and to notice when a colleague is struggling. I also act as secretary for my local badminton club, where I take minutes, keep the membership records and draft the notices for our annual meeting. Last year I redrafted our volunteer code of conduct after a disagreement about coaching responsibilities, which involved consulting members, balancing competing views and producing something short enough that people would actually read it. I enjoyed that drafting work more than I expected, and it gave me a small insight into how policies are received by the people they govern.

An LLM in employment law appeals to me because I want to study discrimination law, collective rights and dismissal in far greater depth than an undergraduate module allows, and to write a dissertation on enforcement of basic pay entitlements in low-paid sectors. I would like to read more comparative material too, since so many of the difficult questions about precarious work are shared across jurisdictions. My longer-term aim is to qualify and practise in this field, ideally in a setting where I advise both employees and smaller employers, who often want to do the right thing but have no in-house guidance. Before that, I want a year of serious, structured study of the subject, and the chance to test my own arguments against people who know it far better than I do.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a credible, well-grounded statement for a taught LLM. Your motivation grows naturally from workplace experience, your LLB project shows genuine engagement with status doctrine, and the clinic paragraph adds sharp procedural insight. The main weaknesses are a customer-service paragraph that leans on generic skills, and dissertation aims that could be framed with more methodological precision.

Subject motivation

depended less on the label on the contract than on how the relationship actually worked

Your opening works because the question arose from a real problem colleagues faced, and you identify the precise legal insight it produced. Linking this to the gap between paperwork and reality gives the statement a thread rather than a vague claim of passion. The phrase 'shaped everything I have studied since' slightly overstates it.

Academic preparation

focusing on the reasoning in Uber BV v Aslam

Naming the case and section 230 shows accurate, appropriate preparation for postgraduate study. The observation about findings of fact, control and substitution demonstrates you understood the reasoning, not just the outcome. Mentioning a 'strong mark' adds little; your reflection on unanswered enforcement questions is the more persuasive evidence.

Evidence and reflection

they are problems of evidence, time limits and confidence

This is your best reflective moment: you draw a non-obvious conclusion from routine administrative work and connect it to an academic interest in procedure. It shows analytical maturity. Your dissertation idea on enforcement in low-paid sectors could build on this more explicitly, perhaps indicating what kind of sources or approach you would use.

Relevant experience

I was not advising anyone, but I read enough intake forms

You describe your clinic role honestly without inflating it, which strengthens credibility. The badminton code-of-conduct redraft is also good, ordinary evidence of drafting and consultation. By contrast, the till and cafe skills sentence about staying calm and explaining refunds reads as generic and is less clearly tied to legal study.

Credibility and voice

test my own arguments against people who know it far better

Your voice is measured, modest and plausible for a recent graduate with part-time work. Claims match your stage, and the career aim of advising employees and smaller employers is realistic and specific. The tone avoids grand rhetoric, which suits the subject and makes the closing ambition feel earned rather than formulaic.

Structure and format

My customer-facing work has been a genuine part of my preparation.

The sequence from motivation to degree, clinic, wider experience and aims is logical and economical. The fourth paragraph is the weakest structurally, as its opening assertion tells rather than shows and it splits into two loosely connected activities. The conclusion is clear, though comparative interest appears late and undeveloped.

What you’ve done well

  • Your Uber and section 230 discussion shows you can analyse how tribunals weigh facts, not just recite outcomes.
  • Your clinic reflection turns modest administrative work into a precise insight about procedure and enforcement.

How this draft could improve

  • Cut or compress the generic customer-service skills and use the space to develop the code-of-conduct drafting insight.
  • Give your enforcement dissertation idea one sentence on the question or method you might pursue, linking it to your project findings.
  • Either develop the comparative interest with a concrete reason or remove it to keep the ending focused.