- Reading time: 4 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 943 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
My history coursework this year asked why living standards in industrial towns improved so unevenly, and I found that the argument only made sense once I looked at wages, rents, food prices and household size together. That was the point at which economic and social history stopped feeling like two subjects stitched together. Studying Economics alongside History has made me want a degree where the two are used on the same question: where a graph of real wages sits next to a workhouse admission register, and where neither is treated as the whole answer. I am drawn to the way economic and social historians work outward from ordinary records. In my Economics lessons we use models that assume people respond to prices; in History I keep meeting people who could not move, could not save, or whose choices were shaped by who they lived with and what their neighbours expected. Reading parts of E. P. Thompson's The Making of the English Working Class showed me how much can be reconstructed about belief and organisation from sources that were never written for historians, and how strongly historians disagree about what those sources prove. I want to be taught to handle that disagreement properly, rather than picking whichever interpretation sounds most convincing. What I am most looking forward to is quantitative training: learning how historical wage series, occupational classifications and census data are actually built, and where they are fragile. I would also like to study places beyond Britain, particularly labour and migration in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, so that I am not only comparing one industrial region with another. In the longer term I am interested in research or policy work where historical evidence is used carefully, but my immediate reason for applying is simpler: these are the questions I find myself still thinking about on the bus home.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A levels give me three useful habits. History has trained me in source criticism and extended argument: my coursework on the standard-of-living debate in the 1840s required me to compare historians who used the same statistics to reach opposite conclusions, and to explain why their categories differed rather than just summarising them. That was the hardest part of the essay and the part I learned most from. Economics has given me the vocabulary I need for the quantitative side of the subject. Working through elasticity, inflation and index numbers made me much more careful about what a price series can and cannot show, and when I later read about cost-of-living indices for Victorian towns I understood why the choice of basket matters so much. I have also become comfortable with graphs and tables as things to interrogate rather than accept. Geography contributes the spatial element. Fieldwork on land use in our town centre taught me to collect data systematically, record method honestly and acknowledge the limits of a small sample, which is much the same discipline as working with an incomplete parish register. I have also studied urban change and internal migration, which overlaps directly with the social history I am most interested in. Alongside this I take part in my college's debating society, where I lead research sessions for younger students and help them find evidence rather than anecdotes. Explaining how to check a statistic's origin has improved my own standards. Outside the syllabus I have been reading around the subject steadily, including Emma Griffin's work on industrialisation and working-class autobiography, which pushed me to think about whose testimony survives and why.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
My main independent project has been a study of one street in my town using the 1891 and 1901 census returns and a local trade directory, all consulted through the library's online subscription and its microfilm collection. I recorded occupation, household size, birthplace and lodgers for around eighty households in a spreadsheet, then looked at how many people had been born outside Yorkshire and how many households took in boarders. I expected to find neat occupational clustering; instead I found a mix of textile workers, a coal merchant and several widows keeping shops, which made me rethink how I described the street's class composition. Learning to code inconsistent job titles was slow and taught me why historians argue about occupational classification schemes. Working Saturdays and Sunday mornings on the tills at a garden centre has been a steadier education than it sounds. I serve regular customers, handle complaints about plants that have died, and cover the cafe when it is short-staffed. It has taught me to be reliable when I am tired, to explain things clearly to people who are annoyed, and to manage my time so that shifts and deadlines do not collide. Several older colleagues have worked there since the site was a nursery, and their accounts of how the business changed have made me more interested in oral evidence and its uses. I sing second soprano in a community choir, which involves weekly rehearsals and two concerts a year, including one in a former mission hall now used as a community centre. Preparing for performances has taught me to keep committing to something over months rather than in bursts. Together, the job, the choir and the archive work have given me the patience that long pieces of research seem to require.
This example has 5,373 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Review this personal statement
Latest reviews
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.