Contemporary history personal statement example

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

My interest in contemporary history began with a disagreement about dates. In a Year 12 lesson we were shown a photograph of a closed mill in West Yorkshire and asked to guess the decade; the class was split between the 1970s and the 1990s, and it turned out that neither answer was wrong for the building in question, because it had shut, reopened briefly and shut again. That small detail changed how I thought about the recent past. The period I live at the end of is not a tidy sequence of turning points but a set of overlapping processes that people experienced at different speeds, and often did not recognise as history at all while it was happening. What draws me to the subject is the awkwardness of studying a period that is still being argued about at bus stops and in local newspapers. The sources are abundant rather than scarce, which creates its own problems: memory shifts, official records are shaped by the purposes they were written for, and the historian has to weigh a council minute against a photograph against a recollection given forty years later. I want to be trained to handle that properly, rather than relying on instinct. I am particularly interested in Britain after 1945, especially migration, housing and the decline of textile employment, and I would like to place those local stories in a wider frame, comparing them with industrial regions elsewhere in Europe. I am also drawn to how governments and broadcasters presented change to the public at the time. Studying the subject at degree level appeals to me because it would give me languages of comparison, archival method and the chance to read historians who disagree with each other seriously.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A levels in History, Politics and English Literature have been a good combination for this course. In History I have studied the Tudors and, more usefully for my interests, the Cold War, where I learned to read speeches and treaties as documents with audiences rather than as statements of fact. My coursework asked whether Khrushchev's policies represented a genuine break with Stalinism, which meant working through historians who used the same evidence to reach opposite conclusions. I found that the strongest arguments were usually the ones that explained the counter-evidence rather than ignoring it, and I have tried to write that way since. Politics has been valuable in a different way, because it has taught me the mechanics of institutions that historians of the recent past have to understand: how legislation actually passes, what a select committee does, why local government finance matters more than it sounds. English Literature has sharpened my close reading; analysing tone and omission in a novel is not far from asking why a report is written in the passive voice. Outside the syllabus I use the college library and free online archives. I have read Selina Todd's The People and David Kynaston's Austerity Britain, and I found Kynaston's use of diaries and Mass Observation material especially interesting because it shows how mundane detail can carry an argument. I have also been working through newspaper microfilm indexes at the central library, which is slow but has taught me patience with a source that does not answer direct questions. My teachers arranged a lunchtime discussion group where four of us present articles to each other, and mine was on how strikes were reported.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

Since Year 11 I have volunteered on Saturday mornings at a community centre near my house, helping with tea, setting out chairs and, increasingly, talking to the same group of older regulars. Last year I asked three of them whether I could record their memories of working life, and they agreed. I used my phone, a borrowed notebook and a list of questions I revised after the first attempt, when I realised I had been interrupting too much. The recordings became a short written piece for the centre's noticeboard, with photographs they lent me. Two of them had worked in textiles and one had driven buses; their accounts disagreed about when the local factory actually closed, which sent me to the library to check, and I learned that the closure happened in stages. Transcribing three hours of conversation taught me how much work sits behind a single quoted sentence, and how easily a historian could pick the neatest line and lose the hesitation around it. I also asked permission carefully and let each person read what I had written before it went up, which mattered more to me than getting a good story. Alongside this I work two shifts a week at a supermarket bakery counter, which has given me a routine, the habit of arriving early and some practice at staying calm with people who are annoyed about something that is not my fault. At college I am a course representative for History, collecting classmates' points before staff meetings and reporting back, which has made me more precise about summarising other people's views fairly. For my own interest I have started mapping the mills marked on an old street atlas against what stands there now, walking a different route each month.

This example has 5,091 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Review this personal statement

Latest reviews