PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Environment, climate and sustainability » Climate change and climate science » Climate change personal statement example

Climate change personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 17th September 2026
  • Word count: 898 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

I started keeping a daily weather log at fourteen, mainly because I liked the tidiness of a full column of numbers. Four years later, the numbers themselves have become interesting: my rainfall totals for the last two summers were noticeably lower than the earlier ones, and the warm spell we had last June produced readings I had to check twice. One dry summer proves nothing, of course, and learning why it proves nothing is part of what draws me to this subject. Climate change is the point where atmospheric physics, statistics and human decisions meet, and none of those can be understood in isolation. Reading Mike Hulme's Why We Disagree About Climate Change changed how I think about the subject. I had assumed that better evidence would settle arguments, and his argument that people bring different values, fears and ideas about fairness to the same data made sense of debates I had watched without understanding. Alongside that I have read about energy systems, including Sustainable Energy Without the Hot Air, which taught me to check whether a proposed solution is the right order of magnitude before getting excited about it. Chemistry has given me the molecular side, from the absorption of infrared radiation to the carbonate chemistry behind ocean acidification, and Maths has made me more comfortable with rates of change and with uncertainty expressed as a range rather than a single figure. I want a degree that builds the physical science properly while taking adaptation, policy and economics seriously, because I expect to spend my working life on the practical question of how places adjust. I would particularly like to study modelling and to understand how climate projections are produced, tested and communicated to people who have to plan around them.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A levels have shaped my approach in different ways. Geography is the closest fit, and my coursework was an independent investigation into surface temperatures across three sites in Portsmouth: a paved shopping street, a park and a residential road with mature street trees. I took readings at set times over two weeks, recorded shade cover and produced a short written analysis. The differences were clear enough to see, but designing the study taught me more than the results did. My sample was small, the weather was not consistent across the fortnight, and I had to be honest in my write-up about what could and could not be concluded. Chemistry has been valuable for its emphasis on mechanism and on quantities. Working through equilibria and thermochemistry has made greenhouse gas behaviour feel like physical chemistry rather than a slogan, and the practical endorsement has made me methodical about recording what I actually did rather than what I intended to do. Maths, especially statistics and calculus, has been the subject I have had to work hardest at, and it is the one I now value most for this degree. Interpreting regression, understanding confidence intervals and thinking about gradients have all appeared in my wider reading on temperature records. Outside timetabled lessons I completed a short online course on climate science over the summer, which introduced me to radiative forcing and to the structure of assessment reports. I also read a weekly summary of environmental news and keep a notebook of terms I do not understand so that I can look them up properly rather than guess from context.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

For the past two years I have helped my grandfather on his allotment, usually on Sunday mornings. He has grown the same vegetables for decades and has been adjusting to drier summers with some reluctance: we have installed two more water butts, mulched the beds heavily, and moved his runner beans to a shadier corner after two poor years. Sitting with him while he decides what to risk planting has shown me that adaptation is made of small, specific, sometimes unwelcome choices rather than broad plans, and that people weigh habit and preference alongside evidence. I contribute my weather log to a local volunteer recording group, submitting monthly totals, and I have learned to be careful about siting the rain gauge and consistent about reading times after a member pointed out that my earlier readings were taken too close to a fence. That correction was useful; reliable records depend on dull consistency. My Saturday job at a garden centre involves advising customers on plants, watering stock and working the till. It has made me quicker at explaining things simply, especially when someone wants a plant that will survive a hot patio without daily watering. At college I help organise the environment group, where I ran a lunchtime session comparing the carbon footprints of different lunch choices and learned how much depends on the assumptions behind each figure. I also swim in the sea most weeks through the year, which is how I first started noticing water temperature and seasonal changes at all, and I play in a community badminton league, which keeps my weekends busy and reminds me that persistence matters more than one good performance.

This example has 5,064 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a thoughtful, well-evidenced statement whose strongest feature is honest reflection on uncertainty, from the weather log to the coursework limitations. Each answer meets the minimum, but together they total about 5,064 characters, well over the 4,000 limit. Cutting will require choosing the most revealing evidence, especially in the third answer, rather than compressing everything evenly.

Subject motivation

One dry summer proves nothing, of course

You show genuine curiosity by recognising the limits of your own data rather than overclaiming. The Hulme reflection works because you explain how your assumption changed. The closing line about working life adjusting places is slightly vaguer; the modelling interest is more concrete and could carry the ending.

Academic preparation

My sample was small, the weather was not consistent across the fortnight

Your Geography investigation is excellent evidence: a clear design, three contrasting sites and candid evaluation. Chemistry and Maths are linked to climate content specifically. The online course and news summary are thinner and could be trimmed when cutting, since they add little beyond what the coursework shows.

Evidence and reflection

reliable records depend on dull consistency

This is real reflection: a specific correction about gauge siting leads to a methodological lesson. The allotment passage also reflects well on adaptation as small, reluctant choices. The badminton line about persistence, by contrast, is a generic skill claim with no link to the subject.

Relevant experience

Sitting with him while he decides what to risk planting

Ordinary experiences are used well here; the allotment illuminates human decision-making, which echoes your Hulme reading. The garden centre and environment group sessions are relevant. The sea swimming arrives late and belongs better near your origin story, or could be cut.

Credibility and voice

produced readings I had to check twice

Your voice is modest, precise and age-appropriate; you never claim expertise you lack. Phrases like 'none of those can be understood in isolation' are slightly abstract, but overall the tone is believable. The weather log appears in answers one and three; make sure each mention adds something new.

Structure and format

Each answer exceeds 350 characters, but the combined total of around 5,064 exceeds the 4,000 limit by roughly 1,000 characters. The library's 3,500 minimum leaves a workable target. The third answer lists too many activities; selecting fewer and deepening them would improve both length and focus.

What you’ve done well

  • Your Geography temperature investigation demonstrates genuine research design and honest evaluation of a small, inconsistent sample.
  • The allotment and the volunteer recording group give ordinary but revealing evidence about adaptation and data reliability.
  • Your reading is reflected on rather than listed, especially how Hulme challenged your assumption that evidence settles disputes.

How this draft could improve

  • Cut about 1,000 characters to fit the 4,000 limit, starting with the badminton sentence, the online course and news summary, and some garden centre detail.
  • Avoid repeating the weather log across answers: keep its origin in the first answer and the fence correction in the third, without restating what it is.
  • Sharpen the end of your first answer around the modelling interest instead of the broader working-life claim.