Urban economics postgraduate personal statement example

Personal statement example

My interest in urban economics grew out of a timetable. During my second year I was commuting by bus to lectures, and the same eight-mile journey took eighteen minutes on one route and fifty-five on another, depending on which side of the ring road I started from. I began collecting the published timetables for my own and two neighbouring wards, and calculating how many advertised jobs on a council vacancies page each ward could reach within forty-five minutes. The differences were larger than I expected, and they did not track distance from the centre at all neatly. That small spreadsheet became the basis of my final-year dissertation.

For the dissertation I extended the exercise using census travel-to-work and occupational data, and read my way into the accessibility literature and into standard urban models. Reading Alonso's bid-rent framework alongside my own city was instructive, partly because it fitted badly: land values here are shaped by post-industrial sites, a river, and two decades of planning decisions rather than by smooth distance decay. Glaeser's Triumph of the City sharpened my interest in agglomeration, though it left me wanting more on why some medium-sized British cities appear to capture so little of it. My supervisor pushed me to be honest about the limits of my method, and I ended up devoting a chapter to what a forty-five-minute isochrone conceals: interchange reliability, childcare hours, shift patterns that begin before the first bus.

Since graduating I have worked as a housing options assistant for a district council. The work is administrative rather than analytical, but it has taught me a great deal about the demand side of housing markets. I process applications, verify tenancy documents, and talk daily to people affected by short notice periods, rent increases and a register that moves slowly. I have seen how households trade off commuting cost against rent in very concrete terms, and how often a move to cheaper accommodation means a worse job match. Reading about search frictions and spatial mismatch after a day of that work makes the models feel less abstract and also less complete. I have also picked up practical familiarity with the datasets councils actually hold, and with how inconsistently they are recorded.

Outside work I have kept the mapping going, teaching myself QGIS from free tutorials and using open data on planning applications and bus service changes in my area. My current project maps the location of new residential permissions against bus frequency in the same year, which is descriptive rather than causal, but it has raised questions I cannot answer with the tools I have: how to handle endogeneity when service provision responds to development, and how to identify anything credibly from a single small area. I want formal training in applied microeconometrics and in the spatial methods that urban economists use, along with a clearer grounding in housing supply, land use regulation and local public finance.

Beyond the taught courses, I am looking forward to a dissertation with better data and better supervision than I could manage alone, probably on the relationship between transport service changes and local rents or employment outcomes. I am realistic about the step up in mathematical demand and have been working through problem sets from an open econometrics course in the evenings to prepare. In the longer term I would like to work in analysis for a combined authority, a housing association or a research institute, where evidence on land, transport and housing actually feeds into decisions. I bring a graduate's grounding in economics, two years of unglamorous experience with how housing systems work in practice, and the habit of following a small question until it becomes a serious one.

Review this personal statement

Latest reviews