Social theory postgraduate personal statement example

Personal statement example

My undergraduate dissertation began with an argument about compost. Our local allotment association had a waiting list of around forty people, and members disagreed sharply about whether places should go by time waited, by need, or by who already contributed to shared work. I interviewed eleven plot holders and found that people rarely defended one principle consistently; they moved between them depending on whether they were describing themselves or someone else. Reading Boltanski and Thévenot on competing orders of justification helped me see this as something other than muddle. That shift, from treating inconsistency as a failure of reasoning to treating it as evidence about how justification works, is why I now want to study social theory formally rather than only as background to empirical work.

My degree gave me a reasonable grounding: modules in classical sociological thought, contemporary theory, and qualitative methods, alongside a strand on social policy that I found useful precisely because it kept pulling abstract claims back to questions of distribution. I worked hardest on Durkheim, initially because I disliked him. The organic solidarity argument seemed to me to smuggle in agreement where there was mostly dependence, and writing an essay defending that objection taught me more about reading carefully than any text I already admired. Since graduating I have kept reading in a less structured way, mostly Bourdieu's Distinction, which I am working through slowly, and some feminist social reproduction theory that I came to through a reading group at the library where I work. The reading group is mixed in background and no one is obliged to finish the book, which has made me better at explaining ideas without the shorthand I leaned on in seminars.

Working as a library assistant has shaped what I want from postgraduate study more than I expected. Much of the job is mundane: shelving, reservations, helping people with the public computers, running a rhyme-time session on Thursdays. But I spend a lot of time watching who uses a free public space and how. People come for warmth, for job applications they find genuinely difficult, for company. Theories of the public sphere read differently after a year of this, and I have become sceptical of accounts that treat access as a matter of availability alone. I would like to take that scepticism into sustained theoretical work rather than let it stay at the level of anecdote.

Alongside this I help my grandmother with a sewing group she has run for over a decade in a church hall. My role is practical, setting up, ordering fabric, keeping the accounts straight, but I have listened to a great deal of talk about what counts as proper work and who deserves what. My grandmother's generation in the group describe unpaid caring labour in terms quite different from the ones I read in theoretical texts, and holding both has made me cautious about theory that cannot survive contact with how people actually describe their own lives.

My longer-term aim is doctoral research, most likely on how principles of desert are invoked in the governance of shared local resources. Before committing to that I want a year focused on theoretical reading and argument: on pragmatist sociology, on debates about recognition and redistribution, and on methodological questions about how far interview talk can support theoretical claims at all. I know postgraduate study is demanding, and I have organised my work pattern so I can reduce my library hours to two days a week. I swim outdoors most weekends, which is an unglamorous habit that has nonetheless taught me to keep going at things slowly. I would come to the course with a clear question, a willingness to be argued with, and the patience to read difficult things twice.