- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 620 words
- File format: Text
Personal statement example
For the last three years I have spent my working days preparing practicals for around a dozen science teachers, and I have learned as much about learning from that bench as I did from my degree. I notice which demonstrations produce genuine discussion and which produce only a pleasing bang. I notice that the Year 9 class who handled the equipment themselves during a rates of reaction lesson could still describe what happened weeks later, while those who watched from their seats mostly remembered the smell. These observations are informal, and I am aware of that, but they are what pushed me towards studying science education properly rather than continuing to guess.
My first degree was in chemistry. My final-year project compared colorimetric test strips with EDTA titration for measuring water hardness in samples from local supply points, and the interesting part was not the numbers but the reasoning: why a cheaper, less precise method might still be the right one depending on the question being asked. I then worked for eight years as a laboratory analyst for a water testing company, running routine microbiological and chemical analyses and, latterly, inducting new starters. Training adults taught me that explaining a procedure is not the same as explaining why it works, and that people follow protocols more carefully once they understand the failure they are guarding against. I suspect something similar is true of school practical work, which is often carried out competently and understood thinly.
Moving into a school technician role was a deliberate step towards teaching, and it has given me a realistic view of the classroom rather than a romantic one. I see the constraints: timetabling, apparatus that must serve six classes in a day, the gap between the practical a teacher would like and the one that is safely feasible with thirty students. I have contributed small things, such as reworking our chromatography kit so that groups get usable results in a single lesson, and I have helped staff trial a microscale approach to some chemistry practicals, which reduced both cost and waiting time. I have also become interested in how technicians and teachers could plan practical work together more often.
Alongside this I help run a Saturday science club at our community centre for children aged eight to twelve. Sessions are short, the group changes week to week, and there is no assessment, so the only thing holding attention is the quality of the question at the start. Planning an activity on floating and sinking for that group made me think hard about misconceptions, because several children were confident that heavy things sink and were not easily dislodged by a lump of plasticine shaped into a boat. I would like to understand the research on conceptual change and on the purposes of practical work far better than I currently do, including the argument that hands-on activity does not automatically produce conceptual understanding.
My reading so far has been unsystematic: some material on assessment for learning, some on scientific literacy and the aims of the science curriculum, and a good deal of subject association guidance on practical safety and technique. Postgraduate study would give that structure, and the chance to look closely at evidence rather than at my own impressions. I am particularly keen to develop research skills so that I can evaluate changes in my own setting properly, and I hope in time to work on practical science provision at departmental or local level.
Returning to study at 34, alongside part-time work, will take organisation, but I have managed shift patterns, evening qualifications in laboratory practice and a household for years. I am ready for the demands and genuinely looking forward to being a student again.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a grounded, honest statement. Its motivation comes from real observation at the prep bench, and your chemistry, analyst and technician background connects coherently to science education. Reflection is often genuine rather than generic. The main gaps are a vague career direction, since teaching versus provision roles is unclear, and the lack of a focused question you want to investigate.
Subject motivation
they are what pushed me towards studying science education properly rather than continuing to guess
Your motivation grows from specific observations: the Year 9 class, and discussion versus the pleasing bang. You also acknowledge that those observations are informal. That makes the wish for systematic study convincing. Stating the question those observations raise for you would sharpen it further.
Academic preparation
why a cheaper, less precise method might still be the right one
Your chemistry project shows you reasoning about fitness of method, not just results. That is a useful foundation for evaluating educational evidence. Your education reading is admitted to be unsystematic, though. Naming one idea or argument that changed your thinking would show readiness more clearly than listing topic areas.
Evidence and reflection
explaining a procedure is not the same as explaining why it works
This insight from inducting new starters transfers carefully to school practicals without overclaiming. The floating-and-sinking misconception is similarly well chosen. In both cases you move from an incident to a principle and then to a research interest, which is genuine reflection rather than a skills claim.
Relevant experience
reworking our chromatography kit so that groups get usable results in a single lesson
These are modest, credible contributions within realistic constraints. The microscale trial adds weight. You could briefly say what you learned from that trial, such as how staff or students responded, to turn an activity into evidence of evaluative thinking.
Credibility and voice
These observations are informal, and I am aware of that
Your voice is measured and self-aware throughout. Nothing feels inflated, and the timeline of degree, eight years as an analyst and three as a technician fits your age of 34. The tone is quietly confident and avoids both romanticising teaching and exaggerating your authority.
Structure and format
I am ready for the demands and genuinely looking forward to being a student again.
The progression is logical and the prose is economical. The ending is the weakest point. It focuses on logistics and enthusiasm rather than returning to your central question about practical work and understanding. Your future aims are also split between teaching and departmental or local provision. Choosing one direction would strengthen coherence.
What you’ve done well
- You use the contrast between pupils who handled the equipment and those who mostly remembered the smell. This vivid, ordinary detail shows real classroom observation.
- You link the analyst-training insight to practical work being carried out competently and understood thinly, a thoughtful cross-context connection.
- Your honesty about the limits of your current reading and evidence makes your case for postgraduate study persuasive.
How this draft could improve
- Clarify whether you are aiming to teach or to work on provision, and match this to the type of programme you are applying for.
- Name one specific question you would like to investigate, such as when hands-on activity does or does not produce conceptual change.
- Replace the closing logistics with a sentence that ties back to the practical-work theme. Keep the point about part-time study brief.