PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Languages, linguistics and translation » Modern and Indigenous languages » Romanian personal statement example

Romanian personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 880 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

I came to Romanian sideways, through a library shelf and a fiddle. Two years ago I borrowed a translation of Mihail Sebastian's journal because the cover caught my eye, and I was struck by how a language I had never heard spoken could carry a world that felt both close to and unlike anything I had read in French or English. Since then I have worked through other Romanian writing in translation, including Norman Manea's essays and some of Blaga's poems in bilingual editions, where having the Romanian text on the facing page started to teach me things: the definite article attached to the end of the noun, the way case endings survive where French has lost them, the layers of Slavic and Turkish vocabulary sitting beside words I could guess from Latin. That mixture is what pulls me. Romanian is the Romance language that took a different road, and studying it means studying contact, borrowing and the history of a region rather than a tidy family tree. I want to read Caragiale's comedies and interwar journalism in the original, and to understand the arguments about language, identity and nation that ran through the nineteenth century and are still audible now. I chose a single-language degree rather than adding Romanian to something safer because I want the grammar, the literature and the history of the region taken seriously together, and because the year abroad is the part I am most looking forward to. Beyond the degree I am drawn to translation and to documentation work in archives or broadcasting, where a less commonly taught language is genuinely useful rather than decorative.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A levels have given me the habits I will need. French has been the most direct preparation: four years of grammar drilling means I can talk about aspect, subjunctives and pronoun order without flinching, and translating unseen passages has taught me to work out structure before reaching for a dictionary. I have found that useful when picking apart Romanian sentences, and also humbling, because my instinct to read Romanian as if it were Italian is usually wrong. History has been where I learned to handle sources that disagree; my coursework on propaganda in interwar Europe involved reading translated speeches and press extracts, and it made me careful about what survives translation and what quietly does not. English Literature trained me to read closely and to write about form rather than plot, which I used in an essay comparing two English versions of the same Blaga poem, looking at how each translator handled line breaks and the repetition that holds the poem together. Alongside lessons I have taught myself Romanian from a course book and a free online grammar, working most evenings for about forty minutes. I can introduce myself, describe my family, manage present and past tenses and read simple news headlines with a dictionary, though my pronunciation of the vowel written with a circumflex still needs a native ear. I keep a notebook of false friends and of words I meet in reading, and I test myself with flashcards on the bus. I know this is a beginner's foundation rather than fluency, and that is exactly why I want structured teaching.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

Every Thursday I visit my grandmother, who has arthritis in her hands, to help with letters, online shopping and the forms that arrive from the council. Reading official English aloud to someone who finds the wording baffling has made me think hard about clarity and about how much meaning sits in the phrasing rather than the vocabulary, which feels relevant to translation. Her neighbour, Doina, often comes round, and over the past year she has let me try my few sentences of Romanian on her. She corrects me patiently, laughs at my stress patterns, and has explained things no textbook told me, such as which forms sound stiff and which sound normal at a kitchen table. That is the most valuable practice I have had. My other route in is music. I play fiddle with a community folk group, and learning Romanian and Moldovan dance tunes from recordings taught me to listen to ornamentation and irregular rhythm before I understood a word of the language; I have since started matching song lyrics to the transcriptions I can find, which has quietly built my vocabulary. At sixth form I help run a language exchange lunch club, where students teach each other short lessons in their home languages; I have organised the rota and taught two sessions on French verb patterns, and I have learned as much from listening to others explain Polish and Punjabi. Saturday work in a garden centre has taught me to be useful when it is busy, to serve customers politely when I do not know the answer, and to turn up reliably at eight in the morning, which I expect a demanding degree will also require.

This example has 4,762 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a genuinely curious, specific statement: your interest in Romanian grows from real reading, bilingual editions and self-study, and you describe your beginner level honestly. The main problem is length. At 4,762 characters it exceeds the 4,000 limit, so you need to cut, especially where the third answer drifts into general employability points.

Subject motivation

Romanian is the Romance language that took a different road

Your motivation rests on observed features: postposed articles, surviving case endings and Slavic and Turkish layers. These show that you understand Romanian as a language shaped by contact. The careers sentence is weaker and could be trimmed. The point about why you chose a single-language degree is worth keeping because it explains a real decision.

Academic preparation

my instinct to read Romanian as if it were Italian is usually wrong

Each A level is linked to a concrete transferable skill: French grammar, the History coursework on propaganda and the English essay comparing Blaga translations. Admitting the Italian mistake shows that you are actually working with the language. The self-study details, forty minutes most evenings and a notebook of false friends, are credible and appropriately modest.

Evidence and reflection

which forms sound stiff and which sound normal at a kitchen table

Your best reflection explains what an experience taught you that books could not, such as register through Doina or meaning carried by phrasing through council forms. The fiddle material reflects well on listening before understanding. The garden centre sentence offers only generic reliability claims and does not earn its space.

Relevant experience

learning Romanian and Moldovan dance tunes from recordings

Everyday experiences carry this answer well. Caring for your grandmother, conversations with a neighbour, a folk group and a lunch club all relate to language and listening without sounding inflated. The language exchange club shows initiative and organisation. Choose the strongest two or three experiences rather than covering everything you do.

Credibility and voice

I know this is a beginner's foundation rather than fluency

Your voice is plausible for a sixth-former. You claim tenses, headlines read with a dictionary and pronunciation problems, not expertise. The humour of being laughed at for your stress patterns feels personal. Nothing reads as professional overreach. The opening phrase about coming to Romanian sideways is slightly crafted but justified by what follows.

Structure and format

Each answer is well over 350 characters and the evidence is not duplicated, although Blaga appears appropriately in two contexts. The combined 4,762 characters breaks the 4,000 limit, so you need to remove roughly 760. Likely cuts are the careers sentence, the garden centre material and some of the reading list in the first answer.

What you’ve done well

  • Specific linguistic observations, such as articles attached to the end of nouns and contact vocabulary, show real engagement with how Romanian works.
  • Your honest account of beginner-level Romanian self-study makes the case for structured teaching convincing.
  • Ordinary experiences, including your Thursday visits, Doina's corrections and the fiddle tunes, are given precise reflection rather than listed.

How this draft could improve

  • Cut about 760 characters to meet the 4,000 limit, starting with the garden centre sentence and the generic careers line.
  • In the first answer, keep one or two named authors with a specific response rather than a list of works read.
  • Tighten the third answer around the experiences that teach you about language, register and listening.