PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Physics, astronomy and space science » Photonics and quantum technology » Quantum technology personal statement example

Quantum technology personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 17th September 2026
  • Word count: 662 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

The part of physics that holds my attention is the gap between an idea being provably true and it being usefully engineered. Superposition and entanglement are a century old, yet building a device that keeps a qubit coherent long enough to be worth using is still genuinely hard. That combination of settled theory and unfinished engineering is what draws me to quantum technology rather than to physics purely as a set of equations. For my EPQ I studied quantum key distribution, starting with the BB84 protocol. What I found interesting was not the elegance of the argument that measurement disturbs an unknown state, but how much of the real security work sits in imperfect hardware: detector efficiency, source brightness, loss in fibre. Reading about single-photon detectors made me realise that the interesting problems in this field are often about noise, materials and measurement rather than abstraction alone. I want a degree that takes me properly through quantum mechanics, solid state physics and optics, and then lets me apply them to sensing, computing and communication. I am also drawn to the fact that the field is still arguing with itself about which platforms will win, so learning the underlying physics matters more than learning any one technology.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A levels in Physics, Maths and Further Maths have been directly useful preparation. Further Maths has been the most valuable: complex numbers, matrices and eigenvectors turned up again when I taught myself to write simple qubit states as column vectors and gates as matrices, and being comfortable with that notation beforehand meant the physics did not feel like pure symbol-pushing. In Physics I particularly enjoyed the quantum and wave modules, and the practical work on diffraction and the photoelectric effect gave me a clearer sense of how evidence for quantisation was actually gathered. My EPQ taught me to read beyond textbooks. I worked through introductory material on quantum information, including parts of Quantum Computing since Democritus, and used review articles and a university lecture series online for the protocol detail. I learned to check whether a source was describing a laboratory result or a theoretical proposal, which is a distinction I had not previously thought about carefully. Writing 5,000 words also forced me to explain ideas precisely rather than gesturing at them. Alongside this I have kept up independent maths practice through a weekly problem set with two classmates, mostly to strengthen my algebraic stamina, which I know matters for a physics degree.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

In Year 12 I proposed and built a demonstration Michelson interferometer for our school physics club, using a cheap laser module, mirrors from a broken projector and a mounting board I made in the workshop. Aligning it took several weeks of evenings, and the fringes only became stable once I stopped the board vibrating by sitting it on a slab of paving stone. Around forty students have since used it in club sessions, and I wrote a one-page worksheet so that Year 10s could measure mirror displacement themselves. Seeing how sensitive it was to a footstep made quantum sensing feel much more real to me. My Saturday job in a camera and optics shop has been unexpectedly relevant. I explain sensor size, aperture and lens coatings to customers who often arrive with a fixed idea of what they need, and I have had to learn to ask questions before recommending anything. It has also made me handle expensive optical equipment carefully and methodically. At the monthly community repair cafe I mostly work on lamps, kettles and toasters under supervision, testing continuity and replacing fuses and switches. Diagnosing faults logically, rather than guessing, is a habit I expect to need in a laboratory. I also play in a local badminton club, which keeps my weeks balanced during exam terms.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a focused, credible statement. Your clearest strength is the specific link between quantum theory and imperfect hardware, and both the EPQ and the interferometer give concrete evidence. The three answers each pass the minimum comfortably. Your main risks are a combined length very close to the 4,000-character limit, some EPQ overlap between answers and a couple of links that could be sharper.

Subject motivation

how much of the real security work sits in imperfect hardware

This works because you show a real intellectual turn: from admiring BB84's argument to noticing detector efficiency and fibre loss. It explains why you want quantum technology rather than physics in general. Your closing point about competing platforms is also thoughtful and avoids claims tied to a particular university.

Academic preparation

write simple qubit states as column vectors and gates as matrices

This is strong evidence because you connect Further Maths content to something you actually did, not just to a subject you took. The diffraction and photoelectric practicals add some experimental grounding. The weekly problem set is a sensible addition, though one example of the problems would make it more convincing.

Evidence and reflection

check whether a source was describing a laboratory result or a theoretical proposal

This is real reflection. You name a specific distinction you learned to make and explain why it matters, rather than claiming general research skills. The paving-stone detail does similar work in your third answer. In contrast, the sentence about 5,000 words forcing precision feels more generic than the rest.

Relevant experience

the fringes only became stable once I stopped the board vibrating

The interferometer is excellent evidence: built cheaply, troubleshot persistently and shared through a worksheet. Your camera-shop job is useful, but the reflection leans towards customer skills. The repair cafe point is honest and appropriately modest. The badminton sentence adds little and could go if you need the space.

Credibility and voice

Seeing how sensitive it was to a footstep made quantum sensing feel

Your voice is consistently plausible for a school applicant, with no overclaimed expertise. This link is the one stretch, though, because a Michelson interferometer is classical. Saying that it showed you how sensitive interferometric measurement is to noise would make the same point more accurately.

Structure and format

For my EPQ I studied quantum key distribution

The EPQ appears in both your first and second answers. You use it for different purposes, motivation and then research method, which is defensible, but you should keep the overlap minimal. Each answer clearly exceeds 350 characters. The combined total looks close to 4,000, so check the exact count rather than adding or padding.

What you’ve done well

  • Your hardware-versus-theory framing gives the statement a coherent thread that runs from the EPQ through to the interferometer.
  • Your preparation evidence is specific and active: the matrix notation for qubits, the source-checking habit and the built apparatus all show genuine engagement.

How this draft could improve

  • Count your characters exactly. If you are over 4,000, cut the badminton sentence and the 5,000-words line first.
  • Rephrase the footstep-to-quantum-sensing link so it is accurate about classical interferometry.
  • Tie one camera-shop detail, such as lens coatings, more directly to optics or measurement.