- Reading time: 4 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 17th September 2026
- Word count: 936 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
My interest in very small structures began with something quite large: a jar of beeswax wraps that my grandmother sells online. She asked me why one batch stayed tacky and another cracked, and the answer turned out to be about how the wax and pine resin arranged themselves as they cooled rather than about the ingredients list. That sent me reading about crystallinity, surface energy and why water beads on some coatings and spreads on others. From there I found articles on superhydrophobic surfaces modelled on lotus leaves, and I realised that the behaviour I was puzzling over in a kitchen was the same question materials scientists ask about films only nanometres thick. Nanotechnology attracts me because it sits exactly where chemistry, physics and manufacturing meet. I like that a change in particle size, with no change in composition, can alter melting point, colour or catalytic activity. Reading Mark Miodownik's Stuff Matters and following materials sections of science magazines has given me a rough map of the field: nanostructured electrodes in batteries, quantum dots in displays, drug delivery carriers, filtration membranes. What I lack is the rigour to judge which claims are near to use and which are still laboratory curiosities, and that is precisely what I want a degree to give me. I am also drawn to the responsible side of the subject. Nanoparticles in sunscreens and textiles raise real questions about what happens when they wash into rivers, and I would rather study that carefully than be reassured by marketing. A course that combines synthesis, characterisation techniques and an honest treatment of risk and regulation is what I am looking for, and I hope eventually to work in materials development for energy storage or water treatment.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
Chemistry and Physics A levels have been the backbone of my preparation. In Chemistry I have enjoyed the transition metal and kinetics work most, because both explain why surface area and catalyst structure matter so much; a practical on the iodine clock reaction made the effect of concentration and temperature on rate feel far more real than the equations alone. Physics has given me the electrostatics, waves and quantum ideas I will need, and the photoelectric effect topic was my first proper encounter with energy levels behaving in steps rather than continuously, which is the foundation of everything I have since read about quantum confinement. Maths, particularly differentiation, logarithms and exponential decay, has been unexpectedly useful for making sense of diffusion and rate graphs in my other subjects, and I have made a point of practising the calculations rather than relying on formula recall. For my Extended Project I compared three approaches to reducing plastic in food packaging, including cellulose-based films and wax coatings on paper. Researching it taught me to read beyond abstracts, to notice when a promising result came from a small sample, and to reference properly. I also learned to cut a topic down: my first plan covered all food packaging and was unmanageable. My AS in Geography, which I took in my first year, gave me a grounding in soil and water systems that I did not expect to value, but it now shapes how I think about where engineered particles end up. Alongside lessons I work through problems on a chemistry olympiad past paper website and have started teaching myself basic Python so I can plot experimental data rather than doing it by hand.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
For about four years I have made soap and candles at home, which is an informal but genuinely instructive introduction to formulation. Cold-process soap involves weighing sodium hydroxide accurately, controlling temperature and accepting that saponification takes weeks; I keep a notebook of batch records with oil ratios, temperatures and outcomes, because I learned early that memory is not a method. Candles taught me about wax crystal size and additives: the same blend poured hot and poured cool gives very different surfaces. Helping my grandmother with her beeswax wrap business added a customer-facing dimension. I redid her instructions after several buyers ruined wraps with hot water, and I ran a simple comparison of two resin proportions, testing tackiness and flexibility over a fortnight in her kitchen. It was not controlled work, but it made me appreciate why standardised testing exists. I also help her at the allotment most Sundays, which is mostly digging and watering rather than science. On Saturdays I work at a garden centre, advising customers on compost and plant care and handling tills and deliveries. It has made me far better at explaining something technical in plain terms and at staying calm on busy bank holidays. Once a month I volunteer at a repair café in my local library, where I mostly test fuses, clean contacts and learn from the retired engineers who lead the sessions. Taking apart a failed kettle or a laptop fan has given me a practical sense of how materials degrade: corroded joints, brittle plastic, worn bearings. I play trombone in a community brass band, which has taught me to practise the boring passages repeatedly, a habit I expect to need in a laboratory. I am looking forward to working with instruments I have only read about, and to being taught properly what I have so far picked up piecemeal.
This example has 5,326 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Review this personal statement
Latest reviews
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.