PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Journalism, media and publishing » Media and communication » Media studies personal statement example

Media studies personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 4 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 915 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

The thing that pulled me towards media studies was noticing how differently the same event can be told. Last winter our local council proposed closing a leisure centre near my college. One newspaper led on falling attendance figures, a community Facebook page led on children losing swimming lessons, and the regional radio bulletin gave it forty seconds between traffic updates. Nothing was untrue in any of them, but the versions felt like they belonged to different towns. I wanted to understand why those choices get made, who makes them, and what happens to people who are talked about rather than asked.

Studying media at A level gave me language for that. Learning about gatekeeping and news values changed how I read a front page, and Stuart Hall's idea that audiences can accept, negotiate or resist a preferred reading matched what I saw in the comments under the leisure centre story, where readers argued with the framing as much as the facts. I am also interested in how ownership and funding shape output, since the outlets covering our story had very different resources behind them.

What I want from a degree is the chance to take this further than analysing single texts. I would like to study audience research methods properly, look at regulation and media policy, and think about how streaming and platform algorithms have changed the idea of a shared national audience. I am equally keen to keep producing work, because editing my own footage has taught me more about construction and bias than any amount of reading alone. A course combining theory with practice suits how I learn, and I want to graduate able to both make media and argue clearly about its effects.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A levels work well together. Media Studies gives me the theoretical frameworks and the production experience; English Literature has trained me to read closely and to support an argument with evidence from the text rather than from my own assumptions; Sociology covers research methods, representation and socialisation, which overlap directly with debates about media effects.

For my media coursework I produced a five-minute documentary about the closure of a bus route used by students at my college. I planned the shoot, filmed three interviews, recorded ambient sound at the stop during a morning rush, and edited it in Premiere Pro. The hardest part was structuring it. My first cut simply ran the interviews in the order I recorded them and it had no shape at all, so I storyboarded the argument first and rebuilt the edit around it. I also had to think seriously about consent and about how my questions were leading people towards answers I already wanted.

In Sociology I completed a piece on research methods that compared questionnaires and unstructured interviews, and this has made me more cautious about how audience statistics are reported. In English I wrote an essay on unreliable narration in a novel we studied, which turned out to be surprisingly relevant to analysing point of view in film.

Outside set work I keep a reading notebook. I have worked through parts of Hall's writing on encoding and decoding, read Jean Seaton and James Curran's Power Without Responsibility for background on the British press, and I listen to media podcasts and read industry trade coverage to follow current arguments about public service broadcasting and streaming.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

Alongside college I work Saturdays in the café at a garden centre, taking orders, running the till and clearing tables through a very busy lunch period. It is ordinary work but it has taught me a great deal about dealing with people who are tired, impatient or simply want to chat, and about staying accurate when three things need doing at once. Explaining a twenty-minute wait to a queue is not unlike interviewing: you need a clear, honest line and the patience to repeat it calmly. I have also been trusted to train two new staff members on the till system.

At college I help produce the student newsletter, which comes out roughly monthly. I write short pieces, chase contributions that never arrive on time, and proofread before we send it to the print room. I persuaded the team to add a regular page where students respond to something in the previous issue, partly because I wanted to see whether readers would actually engage. They did, and the disagreements were more interesting than anything I had written myself.

My independent project grew out of the leisure centre story. I collected the coverage from three outlets over six weeks, logged the sources each one quoted and who was given space to speak, and wrote it up as a two-thousand-word comparison. Counting sources was tedious, but seeing how few residents appeared compared with councillors and spokespeople made the pattern concrete rather than theoretical.

I also coach a junior netball session on Sunday mornings, which involves organising drills for twelve-year-olds and communicating instructions quickly and clearly. Together these commitments have made me organised with my time and comfortable working with people I have not met before, both of which I expect to need at university.

This example has 5,129 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a thoughtful, specific statement built around a strong thread: the leisure centre coverage connects your motivation, reading and independent project convincingly. Your reflection is often genuine, especially on editing and source counting. The main issue is length: at 5,129 characters it exceeds the 4,000 limit, so you need selective cutting, particularly of generic skill claims and weaker outside activities.

Subject motivation

Nothing was untrue in any of them, but the versions felt like they belonged to different towns.

Your opening uses an ordinary local event to raise a real media question about selection and framing. The closing point about people talked about rather than asked shows curiosity beyond liking media. The degree aims are sensible, though the final sentence about making and arguing drifts slightly towards generic phrasing.

Academic preparation

My first cut simply ran the interviews in the order I recorded them

The documentary paragraph is your strongest academic evidence: it shows a problem, a revised method and an ethical awareness about leading questions. Your subject links are clear, though the opening A level summary reads like a list. The unreliable narration example would be stronger if you said what you actually noticed.

Evidence and reflection

seeing how few residents appeared compared with councillors and spokespeople

Here you turn a tedious method into an insight, which is real reflection rather than a skill claim. By contrast, the reading notebook paragraph lists Hall, Curran and Seaton and podcasts without saying what you took from them. One specific argument from Power Without Responsibility would show genuine engagement.

Relevant experience

the disagreements were more interesting than anything I had written myself

The newsletter response page is excellent evidence: you made an editorial decision, tested it, and learned something about audiences. The café comparison to interviewing feels a little forced, and the netball paragraph adds little media relevance. These are fair candidates for trimming rather than additional activities.

Credibility and voice

Counting sources was tedious, but

Your voice is honest and appropriately modest for a school applicant; admitting tedium and a shapeless first cut makes the work believable. Claims are plausible for your stage. Phrases like taught me a great deal and comfortable working with people are weaker, generic moments within an otherwise personal statement.

Structure and format

Together these commitments have made me organised with my time

Each answer has a clear focus and well over 350 characters, but the total far exceeds the 4,000 limit. Your library's 3,500 minimum still leaves room for cutting. The leisure centre example appears across answers one and three; keep the link but avoid retelling it. The generic closing sentence is easily cut.

What you’ve done well

  • The leisure centre story gives the whole statement a coherent, personal through-line from first curiosity to a self-directed source analysis.
  • Your documentary account shows genuine learning about structure, consent and leading questions rather than simply listing production tasks.
  • The newsletter response page shows initiative and an insight about audiences that directly supports your interest in reception.

How this draft could improve

  • Cut roughly 1,100 characters by trimming the netball paragraph, the generic closing sentence of answer three and the A level summary list, not by compressing your strongest examples.
  • Replace the reading list with one specific idea from Hall or Curran and Seaton and how it changed your analysis.
  • Check that the leisure centre background is explained once, so answer three can focus on your method and findings.