PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Libraries, archives and museums » Library and information science » Library and information science postgraduate personal statement example

Library and information science postgraduate personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 617 words
  • File format: Text

Personal statement example

My undergraduate dissertation began with four cardboard boxes in the back room of a community hall. A local amateur dramatic society, founded in 1948, had agreed to let me use its records, and I arrived expecting minute books and found instead programmes, till receipts, costume inventories, three unlabelled reels of tape and a great deal of loose correspondence. Before I could argue anything about how amateur theatre sustained itself in a small town, I had to decide what I actually had. I spent several weeks sorting the material by series rather than by date, drafting a simple listing in a spreadsheet, and writing scope notes so that the committee could find things after I had gone. That listing turned out to be the part of the work I was proudest of, and it is the reason I am applying for a master's in library and information science rather than continuing in history.

My degree gave me the habits that this field depends on: patience with incomplete evidence, care about provenance, and a willingness to explain where information came from. It also showed me the limits of doing organisational work by instinct. My original spreadsheet used headings I had invented myself, so when a committee member asked whether the tapes were described anywhere, I could not answer quickly. Reading afterwards about archival arrangement and description, and about the difference between item-level and collection-level approaches, clarified what I had been improvising. I have since worked through introductory writing on classification and cataloguing, and I have been particularly interested in how controlled vocabularies make searching possible for people who do not share the cataloguer's assumptions about wording. Ranganathan's idea that a library is a growing organism has stayed with me, mostly because it frames organisation as something that has to be maintainable rather than merely correct on the day it is finished.

Since graduating I have worked on the service desk of a garden centre, handling returns, plant queries, orders and the occasional complaint. It is not library work, but it has taught me a good deal about how people ask questions. Customers rarely state what they need; they describe a symptom, or a corner of a garden, and the useful answer comes from a few careful questions rather than from the first thing they said. That is recognisably similar to the reference interview, and it has made me less anxious about the public-facing side of the profession. I have also become the colleague people ask when the stock system will not find an item, largely because I take the time to try alternative spellings and product names.

Alongside this I am secretary of a community film club of around sixty members. I maintain the membership list, the record of what we have screened and the licensing paperwork, and last year I reorganised eight years of accumulated files into a shared structure with consistent naming so that any committee member can find a past licence or programme note. Attendance at our documentary strand improved after I compiled a simple index of previous screenings, which stopped us repeating titles and let us plan around gaps. It is a modest piece of work, but it convinced me that information management is useful in ordinary settings and not only in large institutions.

I hope to develop rigorous skills in cataloguing, metadata and digital preservation, and to understand information literacy teaching and the ethics of access. In the longer term I would like to work in a public library service or a local studies collection, where the records of societies like the one I catalogued tend to end up, and where the standard of description decides whether anyone finds them.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a well-judged postgraduate statement for a taught master's. Your dissertation archive gives a concrete, credible origin for the subject, and you reflect honestly on improvised description. Ordinary work and volunteering are linked to information practice without overclaiming. The main gaps are thin evidence of how you would handle the unlabelled tapes or digital material, and one causal claim about attendance.

Subject motivation

That listing turned out to be the part of the work I was proudest of

Your motivation grows from a specific moment rather than a general love of books. Explaining that the organisational task, not the historical argument, engaged you most makes the move from history to library and information science feel considered and personal rather than a default choice.

Academic preparation

the difference between item-level and collection-level approaches

You name real concepts accurately and connect them to the problem you met, which shows independent reading. The Ranganathan reference is used thoughtfully. You could briefly indicate any formal method from your history degree, such as source criticism or the dissertation's research design, to strengthen readiness for advanced study.

Evidence and reflection

I could not answer quickly

This admission is the statement's best reflection. You show a limitation, what it revealed and how reading reframed it. The reflection would deepen if you said what you would now do differently with the tapes or headings, since the paragraph currently stops at understanding rather than applied learning.

Relevant experience

Customers rarely state what they need; they describe a symptom

The garden centre example works because you show the transferable skill in action instead of claiming communication skills. The link to the reference interview is earned, not forced. The film club filing and index are also concrete, though the scale and method of the reorganisation could be described more precisely.

Credibility and voice

It is a modest piece of work, but it convinced me

Your tone is measured and plausible for a recent graduate, and you avoid inflating community roles. One risk is that the attendance improvement is attributed to the index without explanation. Either show the mechanism more clearly or soften the claim so the causal link is not overstated.

Structure and format

where the standard of description decides whether anyone finds them

The structure moves logically from origin to reading, work, volunteering and aims, and the ending returns neatly to the opening archive. The prose is economical. The final paragraph lists goals somewhat briskly, and digital preservation appears there without earlier evidence, so the aims feel less grounded than the rest.

What you’ve done well

  • The opening archive gives a vivid, specific and credible reason for changing direction from history.
  • You treat ordinary work and volunteering as genuine evidence, linking them precisely to reference and records practice.

How this draft could improve

  • Add a sentence on how you handled or would handle the unlabelled tapes, to ground your interest in digital preservation and audiovisual material.
  • Clarify or qualify the claim that your index improved documentary attendance so the cause and effect are shown rather than asserted.
  • When tailoring to a real programme, connect your stated aims to its actual content and prompt without relying on generic goals.