International political economy postgraduate personal statement example

Personal statement example

My interest in international political economy grew out of a second-year module on trade policy, where I found that the questions I most wanted to answer sat awkwardly between my two subjects. Economics gave me models of comparative advantage; politics gave me states, lobbies and elections. Neither on its own explained why two countries with similar factor endowments end up with very different industrial strategies, or why the same World Trade Organization rules produce such uneven outcomes. That gap is what I want to spend a year studying properly.

My final-year dissertation was an attempt at it. I compared how Brazil and Vietnam sought to attract investment in garment and textile manufacturing between roughly 2000 and 2020, using UNCTAD investment figures alongside government policy documents and secondary literature. The work taught me as much about the limits of my method as about my cases: two countries is not a sample, and I had to be careful not to read intentions into policy from outcomes alone. I concluded, tentatively, that differences in how each state managed exchange rate and wage pressures mattered more to investors than headline tax incentives, but the more valuable result for me was learning how much comparative political economy depends on choosing cases honestly. Reading Peter Evans on the relationship between state agencies and domestic capital helped me think about why bureaucratic capacity, not just policy content, shapes what governments can actually deliver. I would like to build on this with more systematic training in political economy methods, particularly in handling panel data, which I used only in a basic form.

A short work-shadowing placement with a small trade-focused charity sharpened my sense of how this research is used. Over two weeks I sat in on meetings, helped the research officer tidy a dataset of tariff lines relevant to a set of African exporters, and drafted summary notes from a consultation response for internal circulation. My tasks were modest and everything I produced was checked by staff, but observing how a two-person team translated technical rules-of-origin questions into arguments that a select committee clerk might read was genuinely instructive. It also showed me how often the binding constraint is not evidence but the capacity of small organisations to keep track of negotiations that move quickly. I left with more respect for applied policy analysis and a clearer view of the standard of writing it demands.

Alongside my studies I have worked part-time for three years at a garden centre, where I now supervise weekend staff, manage tills and handle stock deliveries. It is unglamorous, but it has taught me to be organised under time pressure and to explain things clearly to people who have no reason to be interested in my explanation. I also volunteer fortnightly at a community advice drop-in, mainly helping people fill in forms and find the right service. That work has made me sceptical of arguments about globalisation that only operate at the level of aggregates; the distributional politics that IPE scholars write about is visible in a very local way in who has secure work and who does not.

My longer-term aim is to work in trade or development policy analysis, either in the civil service or for a research organisation. Before that I want to understand the theoretical debates properly, including the ones I have only encountered second-hand, such as the arguments about financialisation and the political limits of central bank independence. I am prepared for a demanding year of reading and quantitative work, and I would particularly value the chance to write a dissertation with closer supervision than my undergraduate project allowed.

Review this personal statement

Latest reviews