- Reading time: 4 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 914 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
My interest in international finance started with a spreadsheet I built to answer a domestic question: why the amount my parents send to relatives in Chennai buys a different quantity of rupees each month. I began recording the sterling-rupee rate daily, then added the euro and the dollar, and eventually pulled in Bank of England base rate announcements to see whether the movements lined up with anything I could name. They sometimes did and often did not, which is what made me keep going. Reading around the topic, I learned about interest rate parity and why it describes a tendency rather than a rule, and that gap between a tidy theoretical relationship and messy daily data is what I want to study properly.
Economics A level gave me the vocabulary for exchange rate regimes and balance of payments accounts, but it treats the international side fairly briefly. I want a degree that takes it as the starting point: how firms finance themselves across borders, why a company might borrow in one currency and earn revenue in another, and how capital flows respond to policy decisions made somewhere else entirely. Geography has been unexpectedly useful here, particularly work on trade dependency and how a single commodity price can dominate a national budget.
I am drawn to the quantitative side as well as the institutional one. I enjoy the point in a problem where a vague question becomes a calculation, and I would like to be far more confident with statistics and financial modelling than my current tools allow. A course combining finance theory, econometrics and international economics is exactly the training I am looking for, and I expect it to be demanding in a way I will find satisfying.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A levels in Mathematics, Economics and Geography have each contributed something I use. Maths is the subject I work hardest at and enjoy most; the statistics modules taught me to be careful about what a sample can actually support, and mechanics improved my habit of writing out assumptions before calculating anything. Pure maths, especially sequences, series and logarithms, has made compound growth and discounting feel natural rather than memorised, which I know underpins a great deal of finance.
In Economics I wrote a coursework-style extended answer on whether a floating exchange rate protects a small open economy from external shocks. Researching it forced me to distinguish between arguments I found persuasive and arguments I simply liked, and my teacher's feedback on separating evidence from assertion changed how I plan written work. I now draft a short outline of the claim and the evidence for each paragraph before writing, which has noticeably improved my essay marks.
Geography developed my fieldwork and data-handling skills. For an independent investigation on local retail change I designed a survey, collected responses over two weekends and presented the results with charts I had to justify choosing. Learning to explain why a particular graph suited particular data was better preparation for finance than I realised at the time.
Outside the syllabus I have read Tim Harford's The Undercover Economist, which sharpened my interest in incentives, and I follow financial reporting in the weekend papers, keeping a note of terms I do not recognise so I can look them up. Currently that list includes carry trades and sovereign credit ratings.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
For eighteen months I have worked Saturdays and some holidays at a supermarket, moving between tills and the stock room. It is ordinary work, but it has taught me to stay accurate and polite when a queue is building, and stock counting made me genuinely careful about reconciling figures, because a discrepancy has to be found rather than guessed at. I also cover shifts for colleagues at short notice, which has made me better at organising my own study time around fixed commitments.
At college I joined a team of four for an online trading game run as a lunchtime club. Our shared task was to research and present one holding each week to the group. I took responsibility for tracking the currency exposure of the overseas shares we held, and I worked out that a gain we were pleased about was largely a movement in the dollar rather than in the company's price. Explaining that clearly to three people who initially disagreed with me was harder than the calculation, and it taught me to show my workings rather than state conclusions. We finished mid-table across the region, which I mention not as an achievement in itself but because the reasoning behind the decisions improved considerably over the term.
I have kept the currency spreadsheet going for over a year, adding simple moving averages and learning enough about lookup functions to stop copying data by hand. It is not sophisticated, but it is mine, and maintaining it has taught me how much cleaning real data needs.
I also help coach the under-elevens at my local badminton club on Sunday mornings, which mainly involves breaking complicated instructions into small ones. That skill transfers, I think, to explaining financial ideas to people who have no reason to already understand them.
This example has 5,144 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a genuinely personal, well-evidenced statement built around a sustained currency spreadsheet and honest reflection. Its main problem is length: at 5,144 characters it exceeds the 4,000 limit, so you must cut selectively. Some material is weaker or repeated, such as Answer 1's closing generic claims, the badminton paragraph and the spreadsheet appearing twice.
Subject motivation
why the amount my parents send to relatives in Chennai buys a different quantity
Your opening ties curiosity to a real, everyday question and shows how it grew into data collection. Noting that interest rate parity is a tendency rather than a rule shows understanding. The third paragraph slips into generic claims about enjoying challenge and is the easiest place to cut.
Academic preparation
made compound growth and discounting feel natural rather than memorised
You link each A level to a specific skill rather than listing topics, which is convincing. The floating exchange rate essay is especially relevant. The Geography retail survey is less connected to finance, so you could compress it to free space for the remaining material.
Evidence and reflection
a gain we were pleased about was largely a movement in the dollar
This is your strongest reflective moment. You identify a concrete insight, then explain that persuading teammates taught you to show your workings. The feedback on separating evidence from assertion works the same way. Both describe a change in how you work, not just a skill you claim to have.
Relevant experience
a discrepancy has to be found rather than guessed at
The supermarket job is used well. Reconciling stock figures is an ordinary task presented as genuine evidence of care with numbers. The badminton coaching link to explaining finance feels forced and could go. The spreadsheet reappears from Answer 1, so it is duplicated evidence.
Credibility and voice
It is not sophisticated, but it is mine
Your tone suits your stage. You admit limits, list terms you do not yet understand and downplay the trading game result. Nothing sounds professionally inflated. The sentence 'exactly the training I am looking for' is one of the few generic lines and weakens an otherwise distinctive voice.
Structure and format
All three answers clear 350 characters, but the total of 5,144 exceeds the 4,000 limit, so you need to cut. Prioritise removing duplication and generic lines rather than trimming every paragraph evenly. Keep enough to meet the library's 3,500 minimum without padding.
What you’ve done well
- The currency spreadsheet gives you a coherent, credible through-line that shows sustained, self-directed curiosity.
- Your reflections show changed behaviour, such as outlining claim and evidence before writing and showing workings to sceptical teammates, rather than listing skills.
How this draft could improve
- Cut about 1,150 characters by removing Answer 1's third paragraph or condensing it to one sentence, and by dropping or shortening the badminton paragraph.
- Mention the spreadsheet's development in only one answer. Keep the motivation story in Answer 1 and reduce the Answer 3 paragraph to a brief note on data cleaning, or remove it.