- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 817 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
What draws me to Humanities is that the questions I find most interesting refuse to stay inside one subject. In History I studied the 1834 Poor Law and the language of deserving and undeserving poverty; in English Literature I read Hard Times and found the same vocabulary doing different work, this time shaped by a narrator with a case to make. Neither subject alone explained why that language was so durable. A joint or interdisciplinary degree seems to me the honest response to that: not a way of avoiding depth, but a way of asking who produced a source, in what form, and what that form allowed them to say. Reading Raymond Williams's Keywords showed me that a single word like culture carries a history of disputes inside it, and that tracing those disputes is a method rather than a curiosity. I also want the practical training that comes with it. I would like to be much better at handling unfamiliar archives, at reading statistics without either trusting or dismissing them automatically, and at writing clearly for readers who do not share my assumptions. Long term I am drawn towards archives, heritage or local journalism, all of which seem to reward people who can move between kinds of evidence. For now the appeal is simpler: I want three or four years with material I am not yet equipped to read properly.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A levels have shaped how I work more than what I know. History has trained me to be careful with attribution; I learned the hard way that an eyewitness account of the Peterloo meeting is evidence about its writer as much as about the crowd. English Literature has made me slower and more attentive, particularly through a coursework essay comparing narrative distance in Mrs Dalloway and a Carol Ann Duffy sequence, where I had to defend readings sentence by sentence rather than gesture at themes. Geography gave me something the other two lacked: a habit of asking about scale, and some comfort with data. Fieldwork on retail change in our town centre meant designing a survey, discovering that my categories did not fit what I saw, and rewriting them. For my EPQ I looked at how the canal district near me was described between the 1960s and the present, comparing council planning documents with local newspaper coverage. I read what I could reach, mostly digitised newspaper pages and a planning file in the library's local studies collection, and found that the phrase used for the area shifted from derelict to heritage well before much was built. I cannot prove the causes, and my conclusion says so, which was the most useful thing the project taught me. Alongside this I have read fairly widely without a syllabus, including Hobsbawm's The Age of Revolution and essays by Hilary Mantel on writing about the past, and I keep a notebook of quotations and disagreements that has become surprisingly useful for essay planning.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
On Saturdays I work on the returns desk of a department store, which means hearing complaints, checking receipts and explaining policies that customers reasonably find annoying. It has taught me to listen to a version of events before responding, to stay steady when someone is not, and to explain a rule without hiding behind it. Managing a queue while resolving one complicated refund is a genuine exercise in prioritising, and I have become much less afraid of asking colleagues for help early. At my local library I help run a fortnightly reading group for eleven to thirteen year olds. I choose one of the three books we offer, prepare a handful of questions and try to keep the quieter members involved, which usually means asking about a specific page rather than the book as a whole. Watching how differently readers of the same age respond to the same chapter has made me more sceptical of the idea that a text has one obvious meaning. At home I share the school-run and cooking rota for my younger brother with my mother, who works shifts, so I plan my study week around fixed commitments and have learned to draft essays in shorter sessions than I would ideally choose. Outside all this I sing with a community choir, mostly because it is the one activity where I am not the person responsible for anything. Sight-reading a new part badly in front of forty people is good practice for seminar discussion: you keep going, you listen to those around you, and you correct as you learn.
This example has 4,354 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Review this personal statement
Latest reviews
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.