European law postgraduate personal statement example

Personal statement example

My interest in European law began with a seminar problem about a national rule banning the sale of a food product on safety grounds. What struck me was not the outcome but the structure of the argument: the way a trader's commercial complaint becomes a question about who is entitled to decide what counts as a risk, and how much evidence a state must offer before its judgement is respected. I spent the rest of my LLB returning to that tension, and I would like to study it properly at master's level.

My dissertation looked at mutual recognition in the free movement of goods, focusing on how far a member state can maintain its own technical or safety standards once a product is lawfully marketed elsewhere. Reading Cassis de Dijon alongside later case law made me appreciate how much work the proportionality test is asked to do, and how differently it functions depending on the quality of the scientific material before the court. Writing the chapter on precaution was the most useful part of my degree: I had to be honest about where the case law was genuinely inconsistent rather than tidying it into a neat rule. My supervisor's main criticism, that I had described too much and evaluated too little, has stayed with me and changed how I read judgments.

Alongside my studies I made a small independent project out of something that was initially just revision. I was struggling to keep track of preliminary references, so I built a spreadsheet-based database recording the referring court, the treaty provision at issue, the question asked and the outcome, with filters so I could pull up, for example, all references from tax tribunals on a particular article. It was unglamorous work, mostly typing, but it taught me a lot: patterns in which national courts refer, and how often the answer given reframes the question asked. I shared it with three classmates and one of them added a column on Advocate General opinions, which improved it. I do not claim it is original research, but it made me a more careful reader and I would like to develop the underlying questions about the referral procedure in a taught setting.

Group work has been less natural for me, so I was pleased with how a mooting exercise on services regulation went in my second year. My partner and I divided the argument clearly, rehearsed each other's weak points, and I learned to abandon a line of argument quickly when the bench was unpersuaded rather than defending it out of pride.

Since graduating I have worked as an administrative officer in a local authority licensing team, processing applications and preparing papers for committee. It is not European law, but it has given me a realistic sense of how regulatory decisions are actually made: the pressure of deadlines, the reliance on standard forms, and how much depends on whether an officer notices that an application raises an unusual point. I also volunteer as a gateway assessor at Citizens Advice, where listening to people describe a problem and identifying the legal question inside it is essentially the skill my degree tried to teach.

I want to study European law at master's level to work seriously on internal market regulation and the relationship between national and EU decision-making, including how these questions now arise for the UK from the outside. In the longer term I hope to move into regulatory or public law practice, and I would like to be the kind of lawyer who understands the administrative reality behind the case law as well as the doctrine.