- Reading time: 4 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 908 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
I want to study creative writing because I have reached the limit of what I can teach myself by trial and error. Writing on my own, I can tell when a piece is not working, but I often cannot say why, and I have started guessing at solutions rather than diagnosing problems. A structured course, with regular workshops and deadlines I did not set myself, seems like the honest next step.
My interest began with reading rather than writing. In Year 11 I borrowed a collection of Katherine Mansfield's stories from the college library and was surprised by how much was left out of them: conversations begin halfway through, and the endings often refuse to explain themselves. That gap between what is on the page and what the reader assembles is the part of writing I find most absorbing. Since then I have been reading with an eye on the machinery, noticing where a writer breaks a scene, how quickly a character is established, when dialogue is summarised rather than quoted.
I am also drawn to the subject because I write across forms and want to be pushed out of my habits. My short prose tends towards quiet domestic scenes, and I know I avoid plot because I find it difficult. I would like to be made to attempt a long piece, to write for the stage, to sit with criticism from people who owe me no kindness. Studying alongside other writers, reading contemporary work seriously and learning to edit are what I want from a degree, alongside the wider study of literature that keeps the writing from becoming thin.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A levels in English Literature, History and Sociology each contribute something to my writing. In Literature I have studied Othello, Mrs Dalloway and a selection of Carol Ann Duffy's poems. Working on Mrs Dalloway taught me more about structure than anything else I have read: tracking how the narration slides between characters showed me that point of view is a decision made sentence by sentence, not once at the start. My coursework compared the presentation of time in Woolf's novel with a short story I chose independently, and the research involved reading around modernist experiments with chronology, which fed directly into a piece of my own written in a single afternoon.
History has been unexpectedly useful. Preparing a source-based essay on living conditions in nineteenth-century industrial towns, I spent a long time with census extracts and inspectors' reports, and I came away thinking about the texture of ordinary life: what people ate, how many shared a room, what work sounded like. I now research settings properly instead of relying on vague impressions. Sociology has given me vocabulary for things I was writing about instinctively, particularly around class and family expectation, and it has made me more careful about representing people whose experience differs from mine.
Outside lessons I read submissions for the college magazine with two other students. Reading forty poems in an evening, several of them similar, taught me how quickly a reader tires of a familiar image, and how much goodwill a strong opening line buys. Writing brief feedback to people I see in the corridor has also forced me to be precise and fair rather than simply blunt.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
For the past two years I have worked Saturdays and school holidays at a garden centre, mostly on the tills and sometimes restocking the seed displays. It is not obviously literary work, but it has been good for me as a writer. I talk to a great many people in a day, and I have become better at listening to how they actually speak: the repetitions, the way someone circles a subject before asking for what they want, how much is conveyed by a pause while counting change. I have also learned to be reliable when I am tired, which I suspect matters more to finishing a piece of writing than inspiration does.
My main independent project is a pamphlet I produce with two friends, printed on the college photocopier in runs of about thirty. We each contribute a short prose piece or two, edit one another's work and hand the copies out to anyone who will take one. We have made four issues. The editing arguments have been the most valuable part: defending a paragraph out loud, and failing to, is how I discovered that I over-explain my characters' feelings immediately after showing them. In the third issue I cut around six hundred words from a story about a shop closing and it was plainly better for it.
On Sunday afternoons I look after my two younger cousins while my aunt works. We invent stories together, which has taught me something about pace, because a five-year-old signals boredom immediately and without tact. I keep a notebook for overheard phrases and small details, and I set myself a fixed hour of writing four evenings a week, whether or not it goes well. That habit, more than any single piece I have finished, is what I would bring to a degree course.
This example has 4,875 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a thoughtful, specific statement with genuine reflection: you consistently explain what each experience taught you about writing rather than listing activities. Ordinary work, a photocopied pamphlet and babysitting become persuasive evidence. The main problem is length: at a stated 4,875 characters it exceeds the 4,000 limit, so you need to cut, and some evidence overlaps between answers.
Subject motivation
I can tell when a piece is not working, but I often cannot say why
This is an honest, credible reason to study writing formally rather than a generic passion claim. The Mansfield reading then gives a concrete origin, and admitting you avoid plot shows self-awareness. The closing list of what you want from a degree is vaguer and could be trimmed.
Academic preparation
point of view is a decision made sentence by sentence, not once at the start
Your Mrs Dalloway insight shows real technical understanding gained from coursework. The History example about census extracts usefully connects research to setting. Sociology is thinner; the claim about vocabulary for class needs a concrete instance or could be shortened to save space.
Evidence and reflection
I over-explain my characters' feelings immediately after showing them
This is your strongest reflection: a specific flaw discovered through a specific process, followed by the six-hundred-word cut. Similar precision appears in the magazine reading. These moments show learning rather than asserting skills like teamwork or communication.
Relevant experience
how much is conveyed by a pause while counting change
The garden centre work is a good example of ordinary experience used well, tied to dialogue and listening. The cousins paragraph adds pacing insight. The magazine and pamphlet both concern editing peers, so consider keeping one in full and condensing the other to avoid repetition.
Credibility and voice
to sit with criticism from people who owe me no kindness
Your voice is modest, plausible for a school applicant and quietly distinctive. You never overclaim authority. Occasionally phrasing slips toward performance, and the claim that a piece was written in a single afternoon is a weak detail that adds little evidence.
Structure and format
This example has 4,875 characters across the three answers
Each answer comfortably exceeds 350 characters, but the total is roughly 875 over the 4,000 limit. The final note is not statement content and should be removed. Cutting overlapping editing material and generic lines should bring you within limits while staying above 3,500.
What you’ve done well
- You turn ordinary experiences, such as till work and a photocopied pamphlet, into specific evidence about craft.
- Your reflections name concrete weaknesses and how you discovered them, such as over-explaining characters' feelings.
- Your coursework discussion of Mrs Dalloway shows genuine understanding of point of view as a technique.
How this draft could improve
- Cut about 900 characters, starting with the duplicated editing experience between the magazine and pamphlet paragraphs and the general wish-list ending answer one.
- Either give Sociology a concrete example or reduce it to one sentence, so every remaining claim earns its space.
- Remove the closing character-count note, which is not part of your answers.