- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 898 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
Last spring the garden centre where I work on Saturdays changed supplier and stopped selling peat-based compost. Customers were annoyed, and the sign on the shelf simply said the product was unavailable. Over a few weeks I watched the same conversation happen dozens of times at my till, and I began to notice that the explanation that worked was never the one about company policy; it was the one about why peat matters and what the alternative does differently. The decision itself was sound, but nobody had prepared the people who had to account for it. That gap between a decision and its explanation is what draws me to corporate communication. I want to study how organisations build the trust that lets them be believed when something goes wrong, and how internal audiences are as important as external ones. My A-level subjects have given me different angles on the same question. English Literature has trained me to slow down over word choice and to ask what a text is trying to make me feel, which is directly useful when reading a chief executive's statement or a recruitment page. Sociology has made me sceptical of treating audiences as one crowd, since class, age and local knowledge all shape how a message lands. Business has given me the vocabulary of stakeholders, brand and reputational risk, though I have found that the textbook treatment of communication is often thinner than the subject deserves. A degree that brings together strategy, media and ethical judgement is exactly what I am looking for, and I would particularly value studying crisis communication and internal communication in depth rather than as afterthoughts to marketing.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A-level coursework has shaped how I think about this subject more than any single experience. For English Literature I wrote about persuasion and audience in political speeches, and the habit of annotating for structure rather than sentiment has stayed with me. In Sociology I studied media representation and learned to test claims about influence against evidence instead of assuming that messages simply take effect. My Business coursework was the most useful preparation: I investigated why a supermarket redesigned its own-brand packaging, comparing the company's stated reasons with customer comments on social media and with a competitor's approach. I found that the firm's explanation emphasised recyclability while most customer complaints were about being unable to find familiar products quickly, which taught me that organisations and audiences often are not discussing the same thing. Alongside lessons I have read around the subject. I found Robert Cialdini's Influence helpful for understanding why some appeals are more effective than others, although it left me wondering about the ethics of using those techniques on people who are not aware of them. I also follow the PR Week newsletter and listen to podcasts on media analysis, which have introduced me to arguments about whether apologies from large organisations are meaningful. I improved my written accuracy considerably after my English teacher pushed me to cut padding from my essays, and I now draft, leave work overnight and edit properly rather than submitting a first attempt. I have kept a small notebook of statements from companies that I thought were clear or evasive, which has become a useful record of my own developing judgement.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
Two years at the garden centre have taught me most of what I know about talking to people who are not obliged to listen. I take payments, answer plant questions and handle complaints about deliveries, and I have learned to explain a policy without hiding behind it. When our card machine failed on a busy bank holiday I stood at the entrance telling people what was happening before they queued, which reduced the number of frustrated conversations later. My manager has since asked me to write the chalkboard notes for seasonal offers because, as she put it, I write them for customers rather than for us. At home I share responsibility for my two younger brothers three evenings a week while my mother works. That means cooking, homework supervision and a good deal of negotiation, and it has made me organised about time. I plan my coursework around fixed commitments rather than hoping for free evenings, which is why I have not missed a deadline. For the past eighteen months I have produced the monthly newsletter for our allotment association. I collect notices from the committee, interview a plot holder for a short feature and lay the pages out in Word before printing forty copies for the noticeboard and shed. Some members prefer the printed sheet while younger plot holders wanted a WhatsApp summary, so I now write a shorter version for the group chat. Getting the same information to two audiences in different forms has been an unexpectedly practical introduction to communication planning. I also learned to chase people politely for copy, which is a skill I expect to need. Outside this I swim at my local pool most weeks, which clears my head before exam periods.
This example has 5,065 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a thoughtful, well-grounded draft built on ordinary but revealing evidence. The garden centre and newsletter show real communication thinking, and your coursework reflection is sharp. The main problem is format: at 5,065 characters it is about 1,065 over the limit. A-level material also appears in two answers, and a few sentences add little. Selective cutting, not new material, is what this draft needs.
Subject motivation
That gap between a decision and its explanation is what draws me to corporate communication.
This works because the idea grows from something you watched happen repeatedly at your till, not from a stated passion. It also shows you understand that internal audiences matter. The closing line about what degree you are looking for is weaker: it is generic and leans towards describing one particular course.
Academic preparation
organisations and audiences often are not discussing the same thing
Your supermarket packaging investigation is the strongest academic evidence here. You compared the company's stated reasons, customer comments and a competitor's approach, then drew a precise conclusion. The English and Sociology coursework also support this answer well. Your redrafting habit is a genuine study skill, so it belongs here too.
Evidence and reflection
it left me wondering about the ethics of using those techniques
This is real reflection. You question your reading rather than just listing it, and the ethical doubt links neatly to apologies and evasive statements. The company-statement notebook is promising, but you only say it records your judgement. One example of what you noticed in it would make that judgement visible.
Relevant experience
Getting the same information to two audiences in different forms
The allotment newsletter is excellent evidence. You adapted a single message for printed and WhatsApp readers and understood why that adaptation mattered. The card-machine incident and your manager's chalkboard comment also show audience awareness. The swimming sentence and much of the childcare detail are less connected to the subject, so they are the obvious places to cut.
Credibility and voice
I have learned to explain a policy without hiding behind it
Your voice is modest and convincing. Your claims are appropriate for someone your age and never sound like a professional practitioner's. The phrase 'not obliged to listen' is apt. Occasional asides, such as the remark that textbooks are thinner than the subject deserves, risk sounding slightly dismissive unless you briefly show why you think so.
Structure and format
My A-level subjects have given me different angles on the same question.
You introduce all three A-levels in the first answer and then cover their coursework again in the second, which spends characters on duplicated ground. Trimming this from the first answer would save substantial space. You need to reach 4,000 characters or fewer, while keeping above 3,500 and keeping each answer comfortably over 350.
What you’ve done well
- You use the garden centre peat change as a concrete, observed problem that genuinely explains your interest in communication.
- Your Business coursework conclusion, that the firm and its customers were discussing different things, shows analysis rather than description.
- The allotment newsletter shows sustained, practical audience adaptation over eighteen months.
How this draft could improve
- Remove the A-level overview from the first answer and let the second answer carry your subject evidence, so the same material is not used twice.
- Cut the swimming sentence, condense the childcare passage and drop the generic degree description to bring the total within 4,000 characters.
- Replace a general claim, such as the notebook being a record of your judgement, with one brief example of what you noticed.