Comparative law postgraduate personal statement example

Personal statement example

My interest in comparative law began with a problem I could not resolve within a single system. In my second-year contract module I was taught that English law has no general duty to negotiate in good faith, and that this reflects a preference for certainty and self-reliance. The reasoning was coherent, but it left me wondering how other jurisdictions manage without that certainty, and whether they experience the disorder English lawyers seem to fear. I chose the question for my dissertation and spent the final year comparing the English position with the German approach under the Civil Code, using translated case reports and secondary literature in English alongside some French commentary I could follow with effort. What struck me most was not the difference in rules but the difference in the surrounding machinery: judicial style, the weight of doctrinal writing, the availability of general clauses. A rule cannot be lifted out of that machinery and assessed on its own, and I now read borrowed provisions with much more caution than I once did.

My degree gave me a reasonable foundation for this kind of work. I took public law, EU law and a jurisprudence option that made me think carefully about what counts as a legal reason, and I chose an international commercial law module partly because it forced me to look at harmonising instruments and the compromises they contain. Working on the dissertation taught me practical things too: how to be honest about the limits of reading a system in translation, how to distinguish a genuine functional equivalent from a superficially similar rule, and how much time it takes to find out what a foreign court actually does rather than what a textbook says it does. I would like to develop that work at master's level, particularly in the comparative treatment of obligations and in the methodological debates about whether functionalism can bear the weight often placed on it.

Since graduating I have worked as a housing options administrator for a local authority. Much of the job is unglamorous: logging applications, chasing documents, explaining to people in difficult circumstances why a form matters. It has been an unexpectedly useful education in how law operates once it leaves the statute book. The same duty produces different outcomes depending on how staff are trained, what evidence is available and how a phrase like "reasonable to continue to occupy" is applied in practice. That has made me more interested in the gap between formal rules and administrative reality, which seems to me a gap comparative lawyers should take seriously when they describe another country's system.

Alongside work I volunteer one evening a week at a free advice clinic, where I take notes for advisers and prepare summaries of enquiries. I also share the weekend care of my younger brother, who is fourteen and autistic, with my mother. Both commitments have taught me to plan my time closely and to keep studying in the evenings rather than waiting for ideal conditions; I finished my dissertation on that basis and expect postgraduate study to demand something similar.

After the master's I hope to qualify and work in an area involving cross-border commercial or family disputes, where understanding how another system reasons is genuinely useful rather than decorative. In the longer term I would like to keep writing, even in a modest way, about how legal ideas travel between jurisdictions and what happens to them when they arrive.

Review this personal statement

Latest reviews