PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Marketing, advertising and communication » Communication studies » Communication studies personal statement example

Communication studies personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 4 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 971 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

The community centre at the end of my road has a noticeboard that almost nobody read. Last spring I asked the manager whether I could turn the notices into a one-page monthly sheet, printed on the centre's photocopier, and she agreed as long as it cost nothing. Deciding what went on that page taught me more about communication than I expected. A note saying "Warm space open Tuesdays" got a handful of visitors; the same session described as "Tea, biscuits and company, Tuesday afternoons, just turn up" filled the room. Nothing about the service had changed, only the words and what they implied about who was welcome.

That gap between a message sent and a message received is what draws me to communication studies. I want to understand it properly rather than by trial and error. My A level in English Language introduced me to register, audience and the way grammatical choices carry attitude, while Sociology has given me the habit of asking who benefits from a particular representation. Studying communication seems to me to sit between those two: it takes language seriously as a system and also asks about power, institutions and technology.

I am particularly interested in how local and small-scale communication works now that most of it happens through phones. The centre's users range from teenagers to people in their eighties, and a single WhatsApp broadcast reaches some of them and misses others entirely. I would like to study media audiences, the ethics of persuasion and organisational communication, and eventually work in communications for a public or charitable organisation, where clarity matters more than cleverness.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

I am studying English Language, Sociology and Business A levels. English Language has been the most directly useful. Analysing transcripts of spontaneous speech showed me how much meaning sits in hesitation, overlap and repair rather than in the words themselves, and my coursework investigation compared the language of two supermarket loyalty scheme emails with the language of a council letter about bin collections. The commercial emails used first-person plural and questions to imply a relationship; the council letter used passive constructions that removed any acting person. Writing that piece made me notice how institutions sound when they would rather not be held responsible.

Sociology has supplied the framework I was missing. Learning about agenda setting and the way news values shape which stories appear gave me vocabulary for something I had only sensed while choosing what to put on the community newsletter: that selection is itself an argument. I also found the discussion of moral panics useful, because it links media content to real consequences for the groups being described.

Business has been a corrective to any tendency to treat communication as purely artistic. Studying segmentation, budgets and the difference between marketing objectives and marketing tactics reminded me that most messages are produced under constraints by people answering to someone else.

Outside the syllabus I borrow heavily from the library. I read Deborah Cameron's Verbal Hygiene, which changed how I think about complaints that language is declining, and I have worked through an introductory textbook on media and communication theory, taking notes on the criticisms of the hypodermic needle model. I do not always agree with what I read, and I have started keeping a notebook of examples that seem to contradict it.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

The newsletter is now on its eleventh issue. I write it, check details with the staff and print eighty copies, which go on the noticeboard, in the doctors' surgery waiting room and into the hands of anyone who will take one. Practical limits shaped it: one side of A4, black and white, no photographs that would eat the toner budget. I learned to put the date and the cost first, because those are the two things people asked about when I stood by the board and listened. I also started asking a volunteer in her seventies to read each draft, after she pointed out that "drop-in" meant nothing to her. Keeping a simple tally of attendance before and after a mention is not a controlled study, but it has made me careful about claiming that any single change caused anything.

My Saturday job at a bakery has been an unexpected education in everyday persuasion. Customers respond quite differently to "Would you like anything else?" and "The cheese twists have just come out of the oven", and regulars want recognition more than they want a special offer. Handling a long queue at half past nine has also taught me to be brief and clear without being curt, which is harder than it sounds.

At home I look after my younger brother most weekday afternoons, helping with reading homework and getting him to football. Explaining the same thing three different ways to an eight-year-old is good practice for thinking about audience, and managing my own coursework around those hours has made me organised rather than last-minute.

In school I volunteered for two years with the library's reading buddy scheme and now help run a lunchtime debating group, where I mostly chair rather than speak. Chairing has taught me to summarise other people's arguments fairly, including ones I find weak. I would bring to a communication studies course a genuine curiosity about ordinary messages, some experience of producing them under real constraints, and the willingness to check my assumptions with the people I am writing for.

This example has 5,490 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a coherent, personal statement built around one modest project that you analyse with real precision. Your examples are concrete and your reflection is honest about limits. The main problem is length. At 5,490 characters, it must lose about 1,500 characters to fit UCAS's 4,000 limit. Some later paragraphs and the newsletter, which recurs across all three answers, are the clearest places to trim.

Subject motivation

That gap between a message sent and a message received

Your motivation grows from an observed problem: the warm space wording that changed attendance. It does not rest on a claim of passion. Linking that gap to language as a system and to questions of power shows you understand what the discipline studies. The career aim is sensible and modestly stated.

Academic preparation

the council letter used passive constructions that removed any acting person

Your coursework is described as analysis, not as a topic title. You name a linguistic feature and interpret its effect, which shows method. The agenda setting point and the Cameron reading extend this well. The moral panics sentence and the Business paragraph are thinner and could be condensed.

Evidence and reflection

it has made me careful about claiming that any single change caused anything

This is genuine reflection. You recognise that a tally is not evidence of causation, which signals academic caution suited to studying audiences. Similarly, your notebook of examples that contradict your reading shows active engagement rather than passive consumption. Reflection like this is stronger than generic statements about developing skills.

Relevant experience

after she pointed out that "drop-in" meant nothing to her

Your newsletter and bakery examples are excellent ordinary evidence, each tied to a specific communication insight. The childcare and reading buddy material is less developed. The childcare paragraph mainly supports organisation, which matters, but those sentences are where cutting would cost least.

Credibility and voice

I mostly chair rather than speak

Your voice is plausible for a school applicant: practical, observant and never overclaiming authority. Details like the toner budget and the half past nine queue feel lived rather than performed. The closing summary sentence restates qualities the essay has already shown, so it adds little.

Structure and format

The newsletter is now on its eleventh issue.

Each answer stays on its own question and clears 350 characters. However, the total exceeds the 4,000 limit. The newsletter appears in all three answers. Keeping its operational detail in the third answer is reasonable, but trim the repeated references in the first two. Cutting to roughly 3,700 to 3,950 characters also keeps you above the library's 3,500 minimum.

What you’ve done well

  • The warm space wording comparison is a vivid, specific opening. It demonstrates the subject's central question instead of announcing interest.
  • The coursework comparison of commercial and council language shows clear analytical method and a thoughtful conclusion about institutional responsibility.
  • Your caution about causation from the attendance tally is mature, credible reflection that suits academic study.

How this draft could improve

  • Cut about 1,500 characters to meet the 4,000 limit. Start with the closing summary sentence, the reading buddy line and part of the childcare paragraph.
  • Reduce repeated newsletter references across the first two answers so each answer adds distinct evidence.
  • Condense the moral panics and Business sections to one precise point each, matching the analytical depth of your English Language paragraph.