Clinical trials postgraduate personal statement example

Personal statement example

My interest in clinical trials began with a piece of coursework I expected to find dull. As part of a second-year research methods module I was asked to appraise a randomised controlled trial of a physiotherapy programme. The intervention looked sensible and the statistics were tidy, but almost a third of participants had left the study before the final assessment, and the paper said very little about who they were or why they went. That gap stayed with me. It seemed obvious that the people who drop out of a trial are often the people the treatment most needs to help, and that a result which excludes them is only partly true.

I followed this into my final-year project, a systematic review of how recruitment and retention were reported in trials of exercise interventions for knee osteoarthritis. I screened around two hundred records, extracted data from twenty-six papers, and found that reporting was highly variable: some studies gave full CONSORT flow diagrams and reasons for withdrawal, while others reported only final numbers. Doing the work taught me more than the findings did. I learned to write a protocol before I started, to keep a decision log so that my inclusion judgements were consistent across weeks, and to accept that a second reviewer disagreeing with me was useful rather than annoying. I also became genuinely interested in trial design as a practical craft: how an eligibility criterion written for statistical cleanliness can quietly exclude whole groups of patients.

Since graduating I have worked as a data entry and administration assistant in an NHS pathology department. The role is not research, but it has taught me a great deal about the reality of clinical data. I handle requests with missing identifiers, duplicated records and inconsistent free-text entries, and I have seen how a small change to a form can prevent a recurring error. When our team moved to a new specimen logging process I helped write the short reference sheet that colleagues actually use, which involved asking people what they found confusing rather than assuming I knew. I expect data management, monitoring and source verification in trials to demand the same patience and the same respect for people who are entering information under time pressure.

Outside work I help organise a weekly walking group at my local mosque, mostly older women, several managing long-term conditions. Recruiting people to a free walk in a nearby park has been surprisingly instructive: attendance depends on transport, on whether sessions are single-sex, on whether someone remembers to send a reminder message, and on trust built over months. I also share care of my younger brother, who is deaf, and have sat through appointments where written information was handed over with no adjustment made. Both experiences have shaped how I think about participant information sheets and consent. Informed consent is a process rather than a document, and accessibility is not an optional extra if a trial claims its results apply to a general population.

I am applying for a master's in clinical trials to build the methodological and regulatory grounding I currently lack. I want formal teaching in randomisation and allocation concealment, sample size calculation, adaptive and cluster designs, Good Clinical Practice and the regulatory framework, and I would like to strengthen my statistical computing, having used R only at an introductory level. For my dissertation I hope to examine how trials report and address non-attendance among participants with communication or access needs.

In the longer term I would like to work as a trial coordinator or data manager within a clinical trials unit, ideally on studies in musculoskeletal or community-based care, and to remain close to the practical question of who actually stays in a study and why.

Review this personal statement

Latest reviews