- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 4th October 2026
- Word count: 650 words
- File format: Text
Personal statement example
The first floor I ever measured properly was in a Victorian terrace that a housing cooperative was converting into flats. Residents complained that the upstairs living room bounced when anyone walked across it, and my final-year project asked whether that was a strength problem or a comfort problem. It turned out to be mostly the second. The joists were adequate for load, but their spans and the removal of an old partition had lowered the floor's natural frequency enough for footfall to be felt. That distinction between a structure that is safe and one that behaves well in use is what I want to study in depth at postgraduate level.
For the project I used a borrowed accelerometer and a smartphone logging app to record heel-drop tests at several points on the floor, then compared the measured frequencies with simple beam calculations and the serviceability guidance in Eurocode 5. My hand calculations overestimated stiffness because I had treated the floorboards as fully composite with the joists. When I reduced that contribution and accounted for the bearing condition at a wall that had been partly rebuilt, my predictions came within a reasonable margin of the measurements. I proposed two retrofit options, adding blocking and a screwed plywood deck, and estimated the improvement from each. The work earned a first-class mark, but what stayed with me was how much depended on assumptions about connections and supports that no drawing recorded.
Since graduating I have worked as a CAD and survey assistant at a small building surveying practice. Most of my week involves measuring existing buildings, producing plans and sections, and noting defects for the surveyors to assess. I have learned to read a building's history from its fabric: a lintel replaced in concrete, a chimney breast removed downstairs but not above, cracking that follows an extension joint. I am not responsible for structural judgements, but I often prepare the information an engineer relies on, and I have become careful about recording what I actually saw rather than what I expected to find. That habit came directly from my project and has been reinforced by every awkward loft I have crawled through.
This experience has convinced me that I need stronger foundations in structural analysis and design before I can contribute more than measurements. During my degree I enjoyed structural mechanics and found geotechnics demanding but rewarding; I am less experienced with finite element modelling, which I used only briefly in a coursework exercise on a portal frame. Recently I have been working through Structures by J. E. Gordon for its clear account of why materials and forms behave as they do, and practising basic frame analysis in a free software package in the evenings to rebuild confidence I want to develop properly through formal teaching. I am particularly interested in the assessment and reuse of existing structures, since so much of the building stock I survey will be adapted rather than replaced.
Outside work I volunteer on Saturday mornings at a community bike workshop, where I help people repair their own bicycles rather than fixing them myself. Explaining why a wheel has gone out of true or why a brake cable binds has made me better at describing mechanical behaviour in plain terms, which I expect to need when discussing technical matters with clients and colleagues. I also play cello in an amateur orchestra, which mostly teaches me patience with slow, steady practice.
I am applying for postgraduate study because I want to move from recording how structures are to understanding, rigorously, why they perform as they do and how they can be safely improved. I bring careful site habits, a well-documented project grounded in real measurements, and a clear sense of where my knowledge needs to grow. I would approach the course ready to work hard on the analytical and design skills that I know I still need.