PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Philosophy, religion and theology » Religious studies » Buddhist studies personal statement example

Buddhist studies personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 853 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

My interest began with a problem rather than an experience. In a Religious Studies lesson on world faiths we were given a single page on Buddhism, which said that Buddhists believe there is no self. I could not work out what that was supposed to mean in practice, so I borrowed Rupert Gethin's The Foundations of Buddhism from the county library, mostly expecting to confirm what the textbook said. Instead I found a tradition that argues with itself: careful distinctions between what the earliest texts claim, what later Abhidharma writers systematised, and what modern readers assume. The idea that anattā is an analysis of experience into changing processes, rather than a flat denial that anyone exists, was far more interesting than the summary I had been given, and it made me suspicious of every neat summary since. What holds my attention now is the gap between a text and its readers. The Pali canon was preserved orally, written down centuries after the Buddha, and reaches me through English translators who each make choices about words like dukkha and dhamma. I want to study that transmission properly rather than guess at it: how Buddhist ideas travelled into Tibet, China and Japan and were reshaped by local practice, and how far institutions, patronage and monastic rules shaped doctrine. I would also like to learn Pali or Sanskrit, because at the moment I am entirely dependent on other people's decisions about meaning. A degree in Buddhist studies appeals because it treats religion as something to be read historically and philosophically at once, which is exactly the combination I have been reaching for on my own with limited materials.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A levels have given me complementary tools. Religious Studies has the most obvious overlap: our philosophy unit on arguments about personal identity and life after death gave me vocabulary for thinking about rebirth without a permanent soul, and the ethics teaching helped me see why intention matters so much in Buddhist moral thought. For coursework I compared Christian and Buddhist responses to suffering, which forced me to stop treating dukkha as a synonym for pain and to explain conditioned arising in my own words. History has been just as useful. A unit on the Mughal empire taught me to weigh sources by who produced them and why, and to be wary of court chronicles written to flatter a patron. I now apply that instinct to hagiographies of Buddhist teachers, which serve purposes beyond recording facts. English Literature trained the close reading I rely on most: analysing metaphor and structure in poetry is not far from noticing that a verse in the Dhammapada uses a simile of a cartwheel and a footprint rather than an abstract statement. I have also worked at my study habits. Without a specialist teacher to ask, I keep a notebook of terms in Pali and Sanskrit with the differing English renderings I meet, and I check unfamiliar claims against more than one source before accepting them. My college's essay clinic helped me tighten my writing, and I am now much better at holding an argument to one clear line instead of listing everything I know.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

Because there is no temple or Buddhist society near me, I set up a small project of my own. Over eight months I have been comparing four freely available English translations of the Dhammapada alongside the Pali text on an open digital archive, choosing about thirty verses and recording where translators diverge. I write up each one on a simple blog: what the differences are, what a glossary suggests the terms can carry, and which reading seems best supported. Verse comparisons around the word citta were particularly stubborn, since 'mind', 'thought' and 'heart' pull the same line in different directions. The project has taught me patience, honest uncertainty, and how much a footnote can matter. Twice this year I have attended a lay meditation group that meets monthly in a community centre, mostly to listen. I am not a practitioner and have not pretended to be one, but hearing people discuss the five precepts in relation to ordinary work and family decisions showed me a living tradition rather than a textbook one. My Saturday job in a charity bookshop involves sorting donations and serving customers, and I have learnt to explain things briefly to people who have not read what I have read. Looking after my younger cousins two afternoons a week means my study time is planned rather than spontaneous, which has made me disciplined about reading in short, focused stretches. These commitments are not glamorous, but they have given me the steadiness that independent study demands, and I am looking forward to working with teachers, languages and libraries instead of improvising.

This example has 4,730 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a thoughtful, genuinely curious statement whose strength is showing how you learn: questioning summaries, comparing translations and noticing what interpretive choices conceal. The three answers mostly hold distinct evidence. The main problem is length: at 4,730 characters it exceeds the 4,000 limit, so you need selective cuts, particularly in the third answer, rather than any new material.

Subject motivation

made me suspicious of every neat summary since

Your motivation grows out of an intellectual problem, not a declared passion. Moving from the textbook's flat claim about anatta to Gethin's account of processes shows real curiosity and understanding. Your interest in transmission, translation and patronage also shows you know the subject goes beyond doctrine.

Academic preparation

forced me to stop treating dukkha as a synonym for pain

Each A level is tied to a specific transferable method. Source criticism from Mughal history, applied to hagiographies, works especially well. The coursework example shows you changing your understanding. The cartwheel simile link is weaker, because the point about close reading is fairly general and could be trimmed.

Evidence and reflection

'mind', 'thought' and 'heart' pull the same line

The citta example is your best evidence because it shows the actual difficulty, not just the effort you put in. The list of 'patience, honest uncertainty' that follows it is weaker. The concrete detail already makes that point, so you could cut the abstract summary of skills.

Relevant experience

I am not a practitioner and have not pretended to be one

The translation project is ordinary, accessible evidence used well. The meditation group comment is honest and thoughtful. The bookshop and childcare are fine to include, but their reflection is thinner and they take up space the limit cannot spare. Compress them to a sentence.

Credibility and voice

I am entirely dependent on other people's decisions about meaning

Your voice is modest and believable for a school applicant. You admit your limits and do not claim expertise. 'Which reading seems best supported' is appropriately hedged. Little feels inflated, and that restraint is persuasive.

Structure and format

Each answer is over 350 characters and the answers stay distinct. The total of 4,730 characters breaks the 4,000 limit, so you must cut about 730. Good targets are the closing sentence of the first answer, the essay clinic line, the generic skills claims and the final sentence.

What you’ve done well

  • Opening with a misleading textbook sentence about anatta gives the statement a clear, believable starting point and an intellectual direction.
  • The Dhammapada translation project is sustained, independent and well suited to the subject, and the citta example shows real engagement with problems of translation.

How this draft could improve

  • Reduce the total to 4,000 characters by cutting generic claims, especially 'patience, honest uncertainty' and the steadiness conclusion, rather than removing concrete examples.
  • Shorten the bookshop and childcare material to a single line about time management, so more space goes to the translation project.
  • Trim the closing sentence of the first answer, which restates what your earlier examples already show.