- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 868 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
What pulls me towards archaeology is that it deals with people who left no written account of themselves. In Classical Civilisation I have enjoyed reading Herodotus, but I keep noticing how much of the ancient world he simply did not see: the households, the field boundaries, the people who fired the pots he never mentions. Material evidence answers different questions, and often answers them awkwardly, which I find more interesting than a tidy narrative. When I spent a week test-pitting with a community archaeology group in a village churchyard field, most of what came up was post-medieval brick and a great deal of nothing. The group leader explained that an absence of finds in a particular square still told us something about where activity had not happened, and that recording it properly mattered as much as the two clay pipe stems everyone got excited about. That reframing stayed with me. I want to study a subject where interpretation is built slowly from unglamorous data, and where the methods themselves are open to argument. I am drawn to landscape and settlement archaeology in particular, partly through Geography, where I have learned to read contour lines, soil types and drainage as constraints on how people live. I would like a degree that combines fieldwork training with the scientific side, so that I can understand how a date or an environmental sequence is actually produced rather than accepting it as a given. Longer term I am interested in commercial or local authority archaeology, where excavation happens because of development and decisions have to be made quickly and defensibly.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A-levels give me three useful angles on the same material. History has been the most demanding in terms of argument: my coursework compares interpretations of the dissolution of the monasteries, and working with historians who disagree about the same documents has taught me to identify where an interpretation rests on evidence and where it rests on assumption. Classical Civilisation has given me a grounding in Greek and Roman material as well as texts, and I have written about how the layout of Pompeian houses has been used to argue about family life, which was my first encounter with reading buildings as evidence. Geography has been the most practically relevant. Our fieldwork unit involved surveying a river catchment and processing our own data, so I am comfortable with sampling strategies, the idea that a method shapes a result, and basic statistics. I also learned to use GIS software to layer land use and elevation data, which I understand is used in archaeology for predictive modelling and site management. Beyond the syllabus I have read Mike Parker Pearson's work on Stonehenge and, more recently, Francis Pryor's writing on the prehistoric British landscape, which made me think about field systems as deliberate organisation rather than background. I attended a series of free evening lectures at a regional museum, including one on medieval pottery fabrics that was far more technical than I expected; I took notes on how fabric analysis links pots to clay sources and trade. I have also started teaching myself basic Latin from a textbook, slowly, because so much of the documentary material for British sites is in it.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
Two afternoons a week I look after my younger twin brothers, who are nine, while my mother works. This means collecting them, cooking, homework and generally holding a routine together, and it has made me organised in a fairly unromantic way: I plan revision around fixed commitments rather than hoping for free time. It has also made me patient with explaining things simply, which mattered when I volunteered at our community library. I spend Saturday mornings there, mostly reshelving, but I took on tidying and cataloguing the local history collection, which included parish records on microfiche and a box of unsorted photographs of demolished streets. Matching photographs to street names using old maps was slow work and I enjoyed it more than I expected. Visitors would come in wanting to know about a particular house, and I learned to show them how to search rather than just finding the answer for them. My week with the community archaeology group involved digging, sieving, washing finds and filling in context sheets. I was slow at recording at first and had to redo a sheet because my description of the soil was too vague to be useful to anyone else. Since then I have followed the group's newsletter and helped at one finds washing session over the summer. I play in a local netball team, which is my main break from academic work and where I have found being reliable matters more than being the best player. Together these commitments have taught me to work steadily within limits, which I think suits the routine of recording and processing that archaeology actually involves.
This example has 4,864 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Review this personal statement
Latest reviews
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.