PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Chemistry and materials science » Chemistry » Analytical Chemistry and Measurement Science (online) MSc/PGDip/PGCert postgraduate personal statement example

Analytical Chemistry and Measurement Science (online) MSc/PGDip/PGCert postgraduate personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 3rd October 2026
  • Word count: 628 words
  • File format: Text

Personal statement example

The pipette calibration log at the cosmetics factory where I work is a dull document: dates, masses of water dispensed, temperatures, initials. Two years ago I noticed that one 1 mL pipette's readings drifted slightly high every Monday. Nothing failed specification, but the pattern was there. It turned out the pipette was stored over the weekend beside a radiator that came on early. Moving it solved the problem, but what stayed with me was how much a measurement depends on things nobody writes down. I want to study analytical chemistry and measurement science at postgraduate level because I would like to understand those hidden dependencies systematically rather than discovering them by accident.

I graduated with a 2:1 in Biochemistry. My final-year project measured iron in fortified breakfast cereals using ICP-OES after microwave acid digestion. I spent the first fortnight learning that my digestions were incomplete for one high-bran cereal, which gave low and scattered results. Adjusting the digestion programme and adding a certified reference material to each batch brought recoveries within an acceptable range, and I learned to treat the reference material as the first thing to check rather than the last. My results for most products sat close to the labelled values, while two were noticeably higher, which I discussed in terms of fortification overage rather than claiming the labels were wrong. The project taught me that a calibration curve is only the visible part of a method.

For the past three years I have worked as a quality control analyst at a contract manufacturer of creams and shampoos. My routine work includes pH and viscosity testing, Karl Fischer water determinations and preservative assays by HPLC using methods written by others. I have become confident running system suitability checks, recognising when a peak shape suggests a column is tiring, and documenting deviations clearly. Last year I helped my supervisor gather data for a repeatability study on a preservative assay, preparing replicate samples across several days. Seeing the numbers turned into a precision estimate made me want to be the person who designs such studies, not only the one who supplies the data. An online course suits me because I can keep applying ideas at work while I study, and my employer has agreed to flexible hours around coursework.

To prepare, I have been reading the Eurachem guide on measurement uncertainty, working through its examples with my own titration data. Building a simple uncertainty budget for our water determination showed that balance readability mattered far less than I had assumed, and that sample handling in a humid lab mattered more. I have also refreshed my statistics, particularly regression and analysis of variance, since my degree covered these only briefly.

Outside work I sing tenor in a community choir, which has made me surprisingly attentive to tuning and to listening across a group rather than just to myself. On Wednesday evenings I tutor two GCSE students in maths. Explaining why a gradient means something, rather than how to calculate it, has sharpened my own understanding of calibration and given me patience with people who are anxious about numbers. Both commitments have also made me reliable about planning my week, which I expect to need for part-time study.

I am particularly interested in method validation, chemometrics and the traceability of results, and in how laboratories decide whether a method is fit for its purpose. In the longer term I would like to move into a method development or validation role, where I can take responsibility for how reliable a result is, not only for producing it. I bring careful bench habits, practical experience of regulated testing and a genuine curiosity about why numbers behave as they do. I would now like the theoretical grounding to make that curiosity useful.