PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Personal statement guide for photonics and quantum technology

Personal statement guide for photonics and quantum technology

What this subject area covers

Photonics and quantum technology sits within physics but has a narrower focus. It is the study of light, how it interacts with matter, and how quantum effects can be controlled for practical use. Course titles in this family include optics, photonics, laser physics, quantum technology and quantum information science. They overlap, but each gives weight to different things. Your evidence should match the course you are applying for, not the whole family.

  • Optics deals with how light behaves: refraction, diffraction, interference, polarisation, imaging systems and optical instruments. Wave physics and geometry carry much of the weight.
  • Photonics applies optics to technologies that generate, guide, modulate and detect light. Examples include optical fibres, waveguides, LEDs, photodetectors and integrated photonic circuits. It often meets electronics and materials science.
  • Laser physics covers stimulated emission, population inversion, optical cavities, pulsed and continuous lasers, and the uses of coherent light in measurement, spectroscopy and materials processing.
  • Quantum technology uses superposition, entanglement and quantised energy levels in devices such as quantum sensors, atomic clocks, quantum communication systems and quantum computers. Hardware platforms include photons, trapped ions, cold atoms and superconducting circuits.
  • Quantum information science is more abstract and mathematical. It covers qubits, quantum gates, algorithms, error correction and information theory, and it often draws on computer science.

How this differs from neighbouring subjects:

  • General physics: a physics statement can range across mechanics, thermodynamics, particle physics or cosmology. Here, the reader expects your interest to settle on light, quantum behaviour or both.
  • Astronomy and space science: astronomers rely heavily on optics and detectors. An interest in telescopes counts as relevant evidence only if you focus on the instrument rather than on what it observes. For example, adaptive optics or how a spectrograph separates wavelengths would count. Galaxies would not.

Choosing a specific interest

A general fascination with quantum mechanics or lasers tells the reader very little. A useful interest is narrow enough that you can explain the physics involved, what puzzled you and what you did about it. Some realistic starting points:

  • Single-slit and double-slit interference with a laser pointer. You could note how the fringe spacing changes with slit width or distance, then extend this to wave-particle duality and single-photon experiments. This suits optics or quantum applications.
  • Total internal reflection in optical fibres. You might work out the critical angle, then read about why real fibres lose signal through attenuation, dispersion or bending. This suits photonics.
  • Why laser light differs from torchlight. You could move from coherence and monochromaticity to how a cavity selects particular wavelengths. This suits laser physics.
  • The energy levels behind emission spectra. Linking A-level spectral lines or the photoelectric effect to atomic clocks or LEDs works for several branches.
  • Why quantum states are fragile. You could read about decoherence and why some qubit hardware needs extreme cooling or isolation. This suits quantum technology.
  • A simple quantum algorithm or protocol. Working through how a quantum key distribution scheme detects eavesdropping, or why superposition alone does not make a computer faster, suits quantum information science.

Pick one or two of these and go into depth. Several shallow mentions of quantum computing, entanglement and lasers suggest a list of words rather than understanding.

Preparation and activities that give useful evidence

None of the following is a requirement. Each one gives you something concrete to reflect on.

Schoolwork

  • Waves and quantum topics in physics. Practicals on diffraction gratings, refraction, Planck’s constant using LEDs, or the photoelectric effect are directly relevant. Say what went wrong, how you dealt with uncertainty, or what the result showed. Simply naming the practical adds little.
  • Mathematics. Complex numbers, matrices, trigonometry and probability are central to describing waves and quantum states. If you have used matrices to represent transformations, you can link that to quantum gates. Keep the link honest: you are showing readiness for the mathematics, not that you already understand quantum computing.
  • Computing. Simulating interference patterns, ray tracing through lenses, or a basic qubit simulation shows that you can model physical behaviour. A simulation is not an experiment, so be clear about what you assumed.
  • Chemistry. Spectroscopy, electron energy levels and flame tests connect to atomic transitions and laser gain media.
  • Extended projects. A project on optical fibre communication, holography or quantum cryptography can be strong if you explain where your understanding stopped and what you would need to learn next.

Independent activities

  • Home experiments. Measuring a CD’s track spacing by diffraction, seeing polarisation with sunglasses and an LCD screen, or building a simple spectroscope. These show practical curiosity, not laboratory competence. Use a low-power laser pointer only, and never look into the beam.
  • Open-access quantum computing tools. Running small circuits on a simulator or a cloud service can show how measurement collapses results into probabilities. Explain what you observed. Do not claim programming expertise you lack.
  • Reading. Popular books and lecture recordings can help. Reflection is what makes them useful. Name the claim that surprised you, test it against what you know, and note what you could not follow.
  • Talks, open lectures or university taster events in optics or quantum physics, if you can reach them. Mention one only if you can say something specific about the content.

Making ordinary experience relevant

You do not need a placement or laboratory access. Everyday experience can count if you make an honest physical connection and state its limits.

  • Photography or astrophotography. Focal length, aperture, depth of field, lens aberrations and sensor noise are real optics and detection topics. This shows an interest in imaging. It does not show knowledge of optical design.
  • Wearing glasses or contact lenses. Thinking about how a lens corrects focus can lead to geometric optics and lens equations. Keep it brief, because the personal link matters less than the physics you went on to understand.
  • A retail or warehouse job. Barcode scanners use lasers or LEDs with photodetectors. Fibre broadband installation at home or work also relates. Curiosity about how these work is relevant. Operating them is not expertise.
  • Gaming, streaming or home networks. Data travelling through fibre networks connects to photonics and optical communication. This works only if you go beyond noting that fibre is fast and explain how the light carries the signal.
  • Music, stage lighting or theatre. Colour mixing, filters, LEDs and lasers in light shows touch on emission spectra, colour and laser safety. The connection is to light sources, not to quantum technology.
  • Caring responsibilities or medical appointments. Seeing pulse oximeters, laser eye treatment or imaging equipment can prompt questions about how light measures the body. Present it as what made you curious, not as clinical knowledge, and keep personal details proportionate.
  • Volunteering or tutoring. Explaining waves or the photoelectric effect to younger students can show that you understand a concept well enough to teach it. Mention a specific misconception you had to address.
  • Puzzles, coding or chess. These suit quantum information science only if you link them to something concrete, such as logic gates, probability or algorithms. A vague claim that you enjoy problem-solving does not make the link.

What useful reflection looks like

Strong reflection shows how your understanding changed. A useful pattern is to:

  1. Say what you did or read.
  2. Identify the physics involved.
  3. Note a difficulty, surprise or limitation.
  4. Say what that led you to learn next.

Weak: I am fascinated by quantum computing because it will revolutionise technology.

Stronger: After running a two-qubit circuit on a simulator, I expected entangled measurements to look random. They were random individually but perfectly correlated together. That made me read about why entanglement cannot be used to send messages faster than light.

For practical work, uncertainty and error are good material. You might describe how a laser spot’s width limited your fringe measurement, or why ambient light affected a photodetector reading. This kind of detail shows how you think about measurement, which matters across every branch.

Pitfalls specific to this subject

  • Hype about quantum technology. Claims that quantum computers will solve everything, or that quantum means instant communication, suggest your reading has been shallow. Showing awareness of current limits, such as decoherence or error rates, is more convincing.
  • Misusing quantum language. Use terms like superposition, entanglement and uncertainty only where you can explain what they mean physically.
  • Ignoring the mathematics. Quantum information and optics both rely on mathematics. A statement that celebrates the concepts while avoiding their mathematical side may not fit the course.
  • Confusing branches. A quantum information science statement built entirely on lens experiments, or a laser physics statement entirely about algorithms, will look mismatched. Weight your evidence towards the course you are applying for.
  • Writing a general physics statement. Paragraphs on black holes or particle colliders do not show interest in this field unless you connect them to light or quantum measurement, for example laser interferometry in gravitational-wave detection.
  • Treating a career as the subject. Wanting to work in the quantum industry or in telecommunications is fine. The statement still needs to show interest in the physics you will study, not only in the job.
  • Overstating hobby or work exposure. Owning a telescope, using a barcode scanner or reading one popular book does not make you experienced. Describe exactly what you did.

Notes for postgraduate applicants

If you are applying for a postgraduate course in optics, photonics, laser physics or quantum information, your evidence will usually come from degree modules, laboratory work, projects or industry experience.

  • Be specific about techniques you have used, such as optical alignment, interferometry, spectroscopy, fibre coupling, clean-room processes, numerical modelling or quantum programming frameworks.
  • Separate what you did yourself from what your group or supervisor did.
  • Explain why your earlier degree, whether physics, electrical engineering, materials, mathematics or computer science, prepares you for the specialism, and name the gaps you expect to fill.
  • If you are interested in a research area such as integrated photonics, ultrafast lasers, quantum sensing or error correction, show that you understand what problem it addresses rather than only naming it.

For general advice on planning, structure and editing, read our personal statement writing guide.

Photonics and quantum technology personal statement examples