- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 4th October 2026
- Word count: 640 words
- File format: Text
Personal statement example
At the key-cutting counter in the hardware shop where I work, a surprising number of customers ask me whether their landlord is allowed to stop them having a spare made. I cannot give advice, and I say so, but the question is a good one. It sits where property, contract and the practical balance of power between tenant and landlord meet, and it is the kind of everyday legal problem I want to understand properly within the Dutch system.
I grew up speaking Dutch with my mother and spent most summers with family near Zwolle, so the Netherlands has never felt foreign to me. Studying law in England made me notice how differently the two countries approach the same questions. During my second year I spent an exchange semester at a Dutch university. I took introductory courses in private law and constitutional law, taught in Dutch, and found that reading the Burgerlijk Wetboek was a different experience from piecing together English contract law from case reports. The code's structure, with general rules on obligations in Book 6 and specific contracts such as lease in Book 7, made me think about legal reasoning as moving from principle to application rather than from precedent to precedent.
That contrast shaped my undergraduate dissertation, which compared how deposit and service-charge disputes are resolved in England and in the Netherlands. In England I looked at tenancy deposit protection schemes and their adjudication. In the Netherlands I examined the role of the Huurcommissie, which handles certain disputes about rent and service costs outside the courts. I worked from legislation, published guidance and a selection of anonymised decisions available online, and I had to read many of them in Dutch legal terminology that I was still learning. My conclusion was modest: each system makes informal resolution accessible, but in different ways and with different gaps for tenants who do not know the process exists. My supervisor's main criticism was that I relied too much on English categories when describing the Dutch material, and I now see that as the strongest reason to study Dutch law on its own terms rather than as a comparativist from outside.
Public law interests me as much as private law. Learning that Article 120 of the Dutch Constitution prevents courts from reviewing Acts of Parliament against the Constitution, while treaty provisions can still take precedence, gave me an unexpected point of connection with the British debate about parliamentary sovereignty. I would like to understand how Dutch lawyers reason within those limits in practice.
My job has taught me things that a library could not. I have worked at the shop for three years, alongside my degree and now full time, and I am trusted to open up on Saturdays and to handle the cash reconciliation. Explaining to an irritated customer why a restricted key profile cannot be copied without the right card requires the same patience and clarity I will need with clients. Outside work I play korfball for a local club, a sport I first played with cousins in the Netherlands. I also help with registrations and the club's simple membership records, which has made me careful about data and deadlines.
I have been preparing for postgraduate study in Dutch by reading a Dutch newspaper daily, working through legal texts with a dictionary of legal terms, and writing short summaries of court judgments in Dutch to improve my formal register. My written Dutch is good but still more careful than fluent, and I expect to work hard on it during the first months.
I want to build a career in Dutch private law, ideally in tenancy and consumer matters, where clear rules make a real difference to ordinary people. A master's in Dutch law would give me the depth, the language and the professional grounding to do that.