PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Computing, software and information systems » Information systems and business informatics » Business informatics personal statement example

Business informatics personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 4 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 17th September 2026
  • Word count: 974 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

The thing that pulled me towards business informatics was noticing how often a business problem gets described as a computer problem. In my Business lessons we looked at stock control and cash flow, and in Computer Science we were writing programs that read and wrote to files. It took me a while to see that these were the same conversation from two directions: a company decides what it needs to know, and somebody has to design the system that records it, keeps it accurate and makes it available to the right person at the right moment. I find that meeting point genuinely interesting, partly because the technical answer is rarely the hard part. Getting people to agree on what a customer, an order or a completed job actually means is harder. I want a degree that takes both halves seriously rather than treating requirements gathering as something you do before the real work starts. Reading about process modelling, and trying to draw a flowchart of how my own workplace handles a special order, showed me how much detail hides inside a process that staff describe as obvious. I am also drawn to the fact that business informatics involves judgement. A system can be well written and still be the wrong system, because it assumes people work in a tidy order when they are interrupted constantly. Over the next few years I would like to build proper technical skills in databases, programming and data analysis, while learning how organisations are structured and how change is managed, so that I can eventually be the person who translates between a supplier, a manager and a development team without losing anything important on the way.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

I am studying Mathematics, Business and Computer Science, which between them cover most of what I expect to meet in the first year of this course. Mathematics has been the most demanding subject and the most useful discipline. Working through probability and algebraic manipulation has taught me to check whether an answer is plausible before moving on, which transfers directly to spotting when a query returns a suspiciously round number. In Computer Science I wrote my coursework project in Python: a small system for logging the minibus bookings I already manage, with a text file store, a menu and validation to stop double bookings on the same date. Making it robust against odd inputs took far longer than making it work once, and I learned to write down test cases before coding rather than after. Business has given me the vocabulary I was missing. Studying organisational structure, break-even analysis and stakeholder interests helped me understand why a department might resist a system that is technically better for the company as a whole. For one assessment I analysed how a small retailer might move from paper records to a cloud accounting package, weighing training time and data migration against saved hours. I also chose to read around the subject, including parts of The Mythical Man-Month, which made the point that adding people to a late project brings communication costs of its own. In tutor time I completed an extended reading log and presented a short talk to my class on how data protection principles affect what a business is allowed to store, which forced me to explain a legal idea clearly to people with no interest in computing.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

Through my school's careers programme I spent a week shadowing the office team at a plumbing and heating firm employing around twenty engineers. My role was strictly that of an observer and helper. I sat with the two administrators while they took calls, and I was given the job of typing historic job sheets into a spreadsheet so older records could be searched. It was repetitive, but it showed me exactly why their data was messy: the same customer appeared three ways depending on who had written the sheet, and addresses were sometimes missing house numbers because the engineer already knew the street. When I asked about it, the office manager explained they had tried a scheduling package two years earlier and gone back to the whiteboard because the engineers would not update it on their phones at the end of a long day. Nobody had asked the engineers first. That stayed with me more than anything technical I saw that week. On Saturdays I work on a bakery counter, which has taught me to stay calm and accurate when a queue builds and to cash up carefully at the end of the shift. I have also noticed the practical limits of systems there: the till has a fixed list of products, so seasonal items get rung through as something similar, which quietly ruins any sales report. I volunteer with my church transport rota, coordinating the minibus bookings for around a dozen regular passengers, chasing confirmations and rearranging pickups when a driver is unavailable. It is small-scale but it involves the same tasks as any coordination role: recording decisions clearly, following up, and making sure the person who needs the information receives it in a form they will actually read. I play netball for a local club, which I want to continue at university, and it has taught me to accept direction and contribute without needing to be the loudest voice. Together these experiences have made me more curious rather than more confident: I want to study this subject properly so that I understand how to design systems people are willing to use.

This example has 5,364 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a thoughtful, well-evidenced statement. You keep returning to one convincing idea: systems fail when they ignore how people actually work. Your examples are ordinary and concrete, which is a strength. The main problem is length. At 5,364 characters, the draft is well over the 4,000 limit. You need disciplined cutting, not just tightening, and the minibus material needs to be sorted out between answers.

Subject motivation

Getting people to agree on what a customer, an order or a completed job actually means is harder.

This sentence shows real understanding of business informatics, not generic enthusiasm. You place the difficulty in shared definitions rather than code, which is a mature insight. The opening links Business and Computer Science naturally, and your closing ambition to translate between supplier, manager and developers follows logically from it.

Academic preparation

weighing training time and data migration against saved hours

Your coursework is relevant and specific. The paper-to-cloud analysis and the Python booking system show applied thinking. The claim that your subjects cover most of the first year sounds presumptuous, so cut it. The talk on data protection is useful, but you could explain one principle you discussed rather than just its effect on your presenting.

Evidence and reflection

Nobody had asked the engineers first.

This is your strongest reflective moment. You observe something concrete, record the office manager's explanation, and draw a lesson that ties back to your opening argument. The test-cases point in your Python project works the same way. By contrast, the bakery line about staying calm is a generic skill claim with little reflection behind it.

Relevant experience

seasonal items get rung through as something similar, which quietly ruins any sales report

This is an excellent use of an ordinary job. You noticed how a system's constraints corrupt its data, which is exactly the subject's concern. The shadowing week is also well chosen and modestly described. Netball adds little to your case, and with this much over the limit it is the obvious candidate for cutting.

Credibility and voice

My role was strictly that of an observer and helper.

Your voice is plausible for a school applicant. You present the job-sheet task as repetitive and avoid inflating your authority. The ending about being more curious rather than more confident sounds honest. Only the first-year coverage claim slips towards overstatement, so keep everything at the measured level you manage elsewhere.

Structure and format

a small system for logging the minibus bookings I already manage

Each answer stays on its own question, but the minibus rota appears in two answers. Keep the technical project in answer two and shorten the volunteering account in answer three so it adds something new. You must reach 4,000 characters or fewer. Aim for roughly 3,500 to 4,000, with each answer comfortably above 350.

What you’ve done well

  • You sustain one coherent argument across all three answers: technically good systems fail when they ignore users. The engineers who would not update their phones prove this point.
  • You turn everyday settings, such as a bakery till, office job sheets and a church rota, into precise observations about data quality.

How this draft could improve

  • Cut about 1,400 characters to meet the 4,000 limit. Remove netball, the bakery 'stay calm' sentence and the generic coordination-skills sentence before trimming your strongest examples.
  • Avoid describing the minibus bookings twice. Choose what each answer contributes: the software design in studies, and the human coordination in outside preparation.
  • Replace the claim that your subjects cover the first year with one concrete idea from your reading or data protection talk.