- Reading time: 4 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 921 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
I became interested in information design by redrawing a map. My cycling club's Sunday route sheets were photocopied fragments of an Ordnance Survey map with arrows drawn on in biro, and newer riders kept missing turns. I spent a few weekends making a simple strip diagram instead: the route stretched into a straight line, with junctions, gradients, cafes and the two awkward railway crossings marked along it. It was not beautiful, but people stopped getting lost, and I started noticing how much of the information around me could be treated the same way. What draws me to this subject is that it sits between things I already enjoy separately. In Geography I like the moment when a choropleth map makes a pattern obvious that a table of figures hides. In Mathematics I like understanding why a scale behaves the way it does, and what a logarithmic axis quietly does to a reader's impression of growth. In Graphic Communication I enjoy the craft: spacing, hierarchy, the decision to remove a border rather than add one. Information design seems to be the discipline that asks all of these questions at once, and asks them on behalf of a specific reader rather than in the abstract. I am also interested in the ethics of it. A diagram is a set of choices about what to leave out, and those choices affect whether someone catches a train, understands a bill or takes the right tablet. I want to study the subject properly rather than rely on instinct: to learn how research with real users is done, how typography behaves at different sizes and distances, and how to test whether a design actually works instead of assuming that because I understand it, everyone will.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A-levels are Graphic Communication, Mathematics and Geography, which between them cover much of the groundwork I think this course needs. Graphic Communication has given me the most direct preparation. My current project is a wayfinding and signage scheme for our college's new building, which has three entrances and confusing floor numbering. I surveyed where people hesitated, sketched pictograms, and tested two sign layouts by printing them at full size and taping them to the wall to see how far away they could be read. I learned that my first icon set was too detailed to work at a distance, and that consistent placement mattered more than colour coding. Mathematics has been useful in ways I did not expect. Working with percentages, rates of change and statistical measures has made me more careful about how figures are presented: I now think about whether an axis starts at zero, what an average conceals, and how small a sample is before a comparison stops meaning much. Geography contributes the mapping side, including basic GIS work on a fieldwork report about footfall on our local high street, where I had to decide how to classify data into bands without distorting the story. Outside the specification I have been reading about the subject's history. Otto Neurath's Isotype work interested me because the pictograms repeat rather than stretch, so quantity stays readable, and Alberto Cairo's writing on charts pushed me to think about the reader's task before choosing a form. I also keep a notebook of diagrams I meet in daily life, from washing machine dials to bus timetables, with notes on what I would change.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
For the past two years I have helped design and lay out our college student newsletter, which is distributed as a two-page PDF and on noticeboards. I handle the layout and any charts. When we published results from a survey on study spaces, my first version was a pie chart with nine segments that nobody could interpret; I replaced it with a sorted bar chart and a short sentence summarising the main finding, and the editor told me she finally understood our own data. Working to a fortnightly deadline with other people's copy has taught me to make decisions quickly and to accept edits without treating them as criticism. At home I made a medication timetable for my grandmother, who takes several tablets at different times and had been relying on the pharmacy's printed labels. I drew a grid of days and times, used the actual colours and shapes of the tablets rather than names she did not recognise, and printed it large enough to read without her glasses. We revised it twice after she pointed out that the morning column was too close to the edge to see when the sheet was on the fridge. It was a small job, but it showed me that the person using a design knows things the designer does not. My Saturday job in a garden centre involves plant labels, till queues and a lot of customers asking where things are. I redrew the seed display's category signs when my supervisor agreed they were unclear, keeping to the shop's existing colours. Cycling remains my main hobby, and I still produce route sheets for club runs, now with elevation profiles aligned to the turn list so riders can see what is coming.
This example has 4,920 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a thoughtful, specific statement built from ordinary, credible evidence: route sheets, signage tests, a newsletter chart and a medication timetable. Its reflection is genuine and user-focused. The main problem is length: at 4,920 characters it exceeds the 4,000 UCAS limit, so you need to choose your strongest examples and trim them rather than add anything.
Subject motivation
asks them on behalf of a specific reader rather than in the abstract
Your motivation grows from a concrete problem and shows that you understand what makes information design distinct from geography, maths and graphics alone. The line about ethics adds depth. The three-subject paragraph partly previews your second answer, so you could compress it there to save space.
Academic preparation
tested two sign layouts by printing them at full size
The wayfinding project is excellent preparation. It shows surveying, prototyping and testing, and it reaches a real finding about detail and placement. The Mathematics and GIS examples connect convincingly to presentation choices. The Neurath and Cairo reading is used analytically rather than listed, which makes it persuasive.
Evidence and reflection
the person using a design knows things the designer does not
You consistently reflect on what failed and why: the overdetailed icons, the nine-segment pie chart and the column edge on the fridge. Each lesson is specific rather than a generic skill claim. Because you draw the user-knowledge insight more than once, you could state it decisively a single time.
Relevant experience
used the actual colours and shapes of the tablets
The newsletter and the timetable are strong and distinct from your coursework. The garden centre signage and the cycling route sheets add less because they repeat ideas already shown. The cycling material also echoes your opening, so these two examples are the natural places to cut.
Credibility and voice
It was not beautiful, but people stopped getting lost
Your voice is modest, plain and believable. Your claims stay at a school-student scale, and you avoid sounding like a professional designer. Small admissions of failure strengthen your credibility. The editor's quoted reaction works because you present it lightly rather than as proof of authority.
Structure and format
Each answer comfortably exceeds 350 characters, but the total of 4,920 is roughly 920 over the 4,000 limit. Since the library also requires at least 3,500, you should target about 3,700 to 3,950 by cutting repetition, not padding. Your answers avoid duplicated evidence and university-specific claims.
What you’ve done well
- The wayfinding project gives clear evidence of user research, prototyping and revision based on testing.
- The statement uses ordinary evidence, such as a grandmother's timetable and a newsletter chart, to show real design judgement.
- The reading is applied thoughtfully, for example the point that Isotype pictograms repeat rather than stretch.
How this draft could improve
- Cut about 1,000 characters, starting with the garden centre signs and the final cycling sentences, which add little new evidence.
- Shorten the subject-by-subject paragraph in your first answer so it does not overlap with your second answer.
- Keep the 'user knows more' insight in only one place, so your conclusion lands once and firmly.