PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » Marketing, advertising and communication » Communication studies » Global communication and diversity personal statement example

Global communication and diversity personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 3 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 824 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

Every few weeks I sit at my grandmother's kitchen table with a letter from the council or the hospital and turn it into something she can act on. It is never a straight swap of words. I have to decide what matters, what will worry her unnecessarily, and how to explain a phrase like 'you may be eligible' without making a promise. Doing this since I was about thirteen has made me notice how much of communication is judgement rather than vocabulary, and it is the reason I want to study global communication and diversity rather than a single language or a general marketing degree. I am interested in the decisions organisations make when they speak to people who do not share their assumptions. My English Language A-level gave me a vocabulary for this: analysing register, audience positioning and the pragmatics of politeness showed me that the same information can be cooperative or alienating depending on how it is framed. Sociology added the structural side, particularly work on how institutions treat some groups as the default audience and others as an afterthought. I would like to spend three years looking properly at how campaigns, public information and internal messages travel between cultures, what gets lost, and who is usually consulted too late. I am drawn to a course that combines communication theory with practical writing and research, because I want to be able to argue about representation and also produce the leaflet, the brief or the survey.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A-levels in English Language, Sociology and Spanish fit together more closely than my timetable suggested. In English Language I wrote my coursework investigation on the language of NHS vaccination leaflets, comparing an English version with a translated Urdu one that I read with my aunt. Even with my limited analytical Urdu, the differences in tone were clear: the English text used conditional, hedging structures while the translation was more direct, and my aunt read it as an instruction rather than an invitation. Marking up modality and imperatives taught me to make claims from evidence in the text instead of from my impressions, and to be careful about how far a small sample can be pushed. Sociology gave me the habit of asking who produced a message and under what constraints; a unit on media representation introduced me to the idea of audiences reading against the grain of what producers intend. Spanish has been the subject that humbled me most, because translating short news articles showed how often there is no neat equivalent and how much a translator is quietly choosing. Outside lessons I have read Kate Fox's Watching the English, which is light but made me think about unspoken rules, and I am currently working through David Crystal's writing on English as a global language, which has complicated my assumption that shared English means shared understanding. I also joined a college essay club where we critique each other's arguments, which improved my structure and taught me to defend a line without overstating it.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

For the past two years I have collected my younger brothers from primary school three days a week and supervised their homework until my parents finish work. It has taught me practical organisation, and also a surprising amount about explaining things: my youngest brother asks why until I run out of shortcuts. I volunteer on Wednesdays at a community centre homework club, where I mostly help Year 5 and 6 children with reading. Several of them speak Punjabi, Polish or Romanian at home, and I have learned to check understanding rather than assume it, and to avoid the idioms I use without thinking. When the centre needed a notice about a change to session times, I drafted a shorter version using plain sentences and clear dates, and the coordinator used it because parents had been confusing the old wording. My Saturday job on a supermarket customer service desk has been just as useful. Handling refunds, lost property and complaints in a queue has taught me to listen before responding and to keep a steady tone when someone is frustrated. I have also noticed how differently colleagues and customers interpret the same scripted phrases we are asked to use. In my spare time I play badminton in a local league, which is where most of my friendships have come from, and I keep a notebook of signs and adverts that seem to misjudge their audience, including a bus company apology that managed to blame passengers. I hope to keep building that habit of noticing into something more rigorous at university.

This example has 4,536 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a thoughtful, well-evidenced draft. Its strongest feature is how you turn everyday translation and caring responsibilities into precise questions about framing and audience. The main problem is length: at 4,536 characters it exceeds the 4,000 limit by about 540. Cut weaker material rather than compressing your best reflection, and avoid adding padding.

Subject motivation

how much of communication is judgement rather than vocabulary

Your grandmother's letters give a genuine origin for your interest. The phrase you quote names an insight specific to this subject, not just a love of languages. Explaining why you chose this over a single language or marketing shows you understand the field. The final sentence about the course is slightly generic and could be trimmed.

Academic preparation

the English text used conditional, hedging structures while the translation was more direct

This is strong preparation. You name the linguistic features you analysed and connect them to how a real reader responded. Sociology and Spanish each add a distinct angle. The reading is relevant, and you honestly note what each book changed. The essay club sentence is weaker and could go if you need space.

Evidence and reflection

to be careful about how far a small sample can be pushed

Your reflection goes beyond claiming skills. You show methodological caution and describe how your assumptions were challenged, for example by Crystal. In the homework club you name a concrete change in your behaviour: checking understanding and avoiding idioms. Reflection is thinner for the brothers and badminton material, which mostly describes rather than analyses.

Relevant experience

I drafted a shorter version using plain sentences and clear dates

Ordinary experience is used well here. The community centre notice has a clear outcome and links directly to public information. The customer service observation about scripted phrases is also apt. Collecting your brothers says more about organisation than about communication. Badminton has little relevance, so it is the obvious first cut.

Credibility and voice

Even with my limited analytical Urdu, the differences in tone were clear

Your voice is modest and believable for a school applicant. You admit the limits of your Urdu and call Fox's book light, and you never claim professional expertise. The wry bus company detail adds personality without showing off. Keep this restraint when you cut; don't compress it into broad claims.

Structure and format

In my spare time I play badminton in a local league

Each answer is well above 350 characters and the evidence rarely overlaps. However, the total of 4,536 is over the 4,000 limit. Cut about 540 characters by removing badminton, shortening the brothers and essay club material, and tightening the course-description sentence. The draft would still clear the 3,500 minimum.

What you’ve done well

  • The vaccination leaflet investigation links precise linguistic analysis, a family reader's response and an awareness of sample limits in a single example.
  • Everyday evidence, such as translating letters, drafting a notice and working on a customer service desk, is turned into specific observations about audience and framing rather than generic skill claims.

How this draft could improve

  • Reduce the total by at least 540 characters, starting with badminton, the brothers' homework sentences and the essay club line, while keeping your analytical examples intact.
  • Replace the general 'I am drawn to a course that combines' sentence with a shorter statement of the questions you want to investigate, so it works for every choice.
  • If you keep the signs notebook, add one brief note on what pattern you noticed, so it reads as emerging analysis rather than a hobby.