PERSONAL STATEMENT
EXAMPLES
My statements
Home » Subject areas » History, archaeology and heritage » Archaeology » Assyriology personal statement example

Assyriology personal statement example

PSE example
  • Reading time: 4 minutes
  • Price: Free download
  • Published: 16th September 2026
  • Word count: 929 words
  • File format: Text

Why do you want to study this course or subject?

My interest in Assyriology began with a display case rather than a book. On a wet Tuesday in Year 11 our class was taken to a city museum, and while most people drifted towards the Egyptian galleries I stopped at a small clay tablet about the size of my palm, catalogued as a record of grain. What struck me was how ordinary it was: someone had pressed a stylus into damp clay to keep track of a delivery, and three or four thousand years later I was reading the label. I wanted to know how those signs worked, who wrote them, and why a bureaucratic note survives when so much else does not.

Since then I have read more widely, including Karen Radner's short introduction to ancient Assyria and Irving Finkel and Jonathan Taylor's book on cuneiform, which gave me a clearer sense of how the script developed from accounting marks into a system flexible enough to carry Sumerian and Akkadian, letters, omens, laws and literature. I was surprised that scribes trained by copying sign lists and proverbs, and that so much of what we know comes from school exercises. That practical, technical side appeals to me: philology as careful, patient work with damaged objects rather than sweeping stories.

I am applying for Assyriology because I want the languages properly, not in translation. I enjoy the slow puzzle of grammar, and I would like to work eventually in museum or archive cataloguing, where linguistic training and handling skills matter. Studying a field with a small number of specialists and an enormous body of unpublished material seems to me a good reason to join it rather than a discouragement.

How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?

My A levels are History, Latin and Geography, and each has contributed something I expect to use. Latin has been the most directly relevant: two years of steady declension practice, unseen translation and set text work on Virgil have taught me to sit with a sentence I cannot immediately understand and work outwards from the verb. Learning to accept that a first reading is often wrong has been useful preparation for languages with a far less familiar structure, and I have found that I genuinely like the mechanics of case and tense.

In History I study early modern Britain and a unit on the Crusades, where source reliability is central. Writing about chronicles with obvious agendas made me think harder about royal inscriptions from Assyria, which I understand were often composed to present campaigns in a particular light rather than as neutral reporting. Geography has given me something different again: my coursework on river sediment in a local catchment involved fieldwork, sampling and honest discussion of where my data were weak, which is closer to archaeological method than I expected.

Outside the syllabus I taught myself the basic cuneiform sign values used for Akkadian syllables using free online sign lists, and I have made slow progress reading transliterated lines with a glossary. It is careful rather than fast work, and I know I am at the very start. I also attended a free online lecture series on Mesopotamian cities. My school does not offer anything like this subject, so most of my preparation has been self-directed, fitted around timetabled lessons and revision.

What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?

For a Year 12 humanities project I designed and built a small exhibition on the invention of writing, displayed for a fortnight in the school library. I made clay tablets with a cut reed stylus so that younger pupils could try impressing signs themselves, wrote six explanatory panels, and produced a simple handout comparing an administrative tablet with a later literary one. The practical part taught me a lot: wet clay behaves very differently from paper, and my first attempts were unreadable smudges. Around ninety Year 7 and 8 pupils took part, and my head of department asked me to run the activity again during an open evening, which I did. Explaining the same idea to different audiences without either patronising them or losing accuracy was the hardest part, and the most useful.

I belong to a local history and archaeology society, most of whose members are considerably older than me. I have spent Saturday mornings washing and sorting pottery from a Roman site, mainly coarse greyware, and learning to record finds correctly under supervision. It is repetitive and cold, and I have grown to like it. The society also introduced me to volunteers who catalogue local records, which is what first made me think about archive work as a career.

On Saturdays and through the holidays I work at a garden centre, mostly on tills and the customer desk, handling refunds, plant queries and the occasional complaint. I have learned to keep a queue moving while giving someone a proper answer, to stay steady when a customer is annoyed, and to manage my own time when I am tired. Balancing eighteen hours a fortnight with A levels has made me organised out of necessity, and I now plan revision weekly rather than hoping for free evenings.

I read for pleasure as well, currently working through translated Mesopotamian literature, and I play in a badminton club league, which I keep up because it gets me away from a desk.

This example has 5,137 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.

Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve

This is a well-grounded Assyriology statement with concrete reading, honest self-study and practical experience that links clearly to the subject. Reflection is usually specific rather than generic. The main problem is length: at 5,137 characters it is over the 4,000 limit, so you need to make selective cuts. Some outside activities and a few repeated points add little and could go.

Subject motivation

catalogued as a record of grain

The ordinary grain tablet is a strong starting point. It shows curiosity about scripts, scribes and survival rather than glamour. The questions that follow lead naturally into philology. Your later preference for careful, patient work over sweeping stories confirms that the interest has developed beyond a single museum visit.

Academic preparation

work outwards from the verb

Your Latin evidence is precise and transferable, describing a real method of reading difficult sentences. The point about source reliability in History connects sensibly to royal inscriptions, and you hedge it appropriately. The Geography sediment fieldwork is reasonable, but its link to archaeological method is weaker and would be an obvious place to trim.

Evidence and reflection

my first attempts were unreadable smudges

You reflect well when you describe difficulty. The failed clay attempts, accepting that a first reading is often wrong, and explaining ideas accurately to different audiences all show learning rather than simply claiming skills. The garden centre paragraph drifts towards a generic list of skills, such as being organised and staying steady, and has less subject relevance.

Relevant experience

learning to record finds correctly under supervision

Sorting pottery with the society and running the school exhibition are well-chosen, accessible evidence that relates directly to handling material and cataloguing. Saying the work is repetitive and cold, and that you grew to like it, is persuasive. The final paragraph about reading and badminton contributes little and could be removed.

Credibility and voice

I know I am at the very start

Your voice is modest and age-appropriate throughout. You are honest about how far your self-taught sign values go, and you never claim expertise. The museum and archive career aim is plausible. You mention archive work as a career twice, so one of those mentions could be cut to avoid repetition.

Structure and format

Each answer clearly exceeds 350 characters, and the order of ideas is logical. However, the 5,137 characters in total exceed the 4,000 limit, so you must cut about 1,140 characters. The closing note about character counts is not part of the statement. Do not add padding. Trim the hobbies, compress the job paragraph and tighten the Geography material.

What you’ve done well

  • The grain tablet opening establishes a specific, unpretentious interest in how cuneiform actually worked.
  • Your Latin and self-taught sign study show transferable language habits, described with honest limits.
  • The exhibition and pottery work show hands-on engagement with objects and with explaining them to others.

How this draft could improve

  • Cut the reading and badminton paragraph and shorten the garden centre paragraph to one reflective point so the total fits 4,000 characters.
  • Reduce the Geography material to a single sentence, or drop it, keeping only what clearly informs how you would approach evidence.
  • Mention the archive-cataloguing aim once, in whichever answer it fits best, to avoid repetition.