- Reading time: 2 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 582 words
- File format: Text
Personal statement example
My interest in insurance law began with a contract law seminar on non-disclosure, where I could not work out why a rule so favourable to insurers had survived for a century. That question shaped my final-year dissertation, in which I compared the old avoidance-or-nothing remedy for non-disclosure with the proportionate remedies introduced by the Insurance Act 2015 for breach of the duty of fair presentation. Reading the Law Commission materials alongside the Act taught me something I had not appreciated from textbooks: that reform in this field is usually a negotiation between market practice and doctrinal tidiness, and that the drafting compromises are often where the interesting problems sit. I argued that the remedies regime improves fairness for business policyholders but leaves genuine uncertainty about how a court will reconstruct what an insurer would have done had the risk been fairly presented. Supervision pushed me to be more careful about evidence, and I would now want to test that argument against decided cases rather than commentary alone.
My LLB gave me the foundations I rely on: contract, tort, equity and a commercial law option covering agency and sale of goods. I found agency particularly useful once I started work, because the broker's dual role is rarely as neat in practice as the cases suggest. Since graduating I have worked as a claims administrator for a regional broker, mainly handling household and small commercial property claims. My role is administrative rather than technical: I log notifications, chase loss adjusters, check policy schedules against the declared cover and explain next steps to policyholders. Even at that level I have learned how much turns on ordinary questions of construction. I have seen disputes about whether an unoccupied property was unoccupied for the purposes of a condition, and about whether a sequence of events constituted one occurrence or several. I do not make those decisions, but I read the correspondence that surrounds them, and it has given me a practical sense of why insurance contract wording is litigated so often. It also prompted me to read around the Enterprise Act 2016 provision on damages for late payment of claims, having watched how much the timing of payment matters to a small business.
Outside work, I volunteer twice a month at a community advice drop-in, helping people complete benefit and housing forms. I cannot give legal advice, and the boundary is taken seriously, but the sessions have improved my ability to ask clear questions and to explain a process without jargon. I also share the care of my younger brother, who is eleven, which has made me organised about study: my dissertation was largely written in early mornings before work, and I expect to approach a master's with the same discipline.
On the programme I hope to study insurance contract law in proper depth, together with reinsurance and the regulatory framework, which I currently understand only in outline. I am especially keen to look at business interruption cover and aggregation, and at how warranties and conditions operate following the 2015 Act's changes to basis clauses and suspensory conditions. My longer-term aim is to qualify and work in insurance disputes or coverage advisory work, and I would like my dissertation to develop my earlier research by examining how the fair presentation duty has been applied in practice since 2016. A taught master's is the route that would let me move from handling the paperwork of claims to understanding and arguing about the law that decides them.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a focused, credible statement for a taught master's in insurance law. Your motivation grows from a genuine doctrinal question, your dissertation shows real analytical judgement, and your claims work is described honestly. The main gaps are thin methodological detail, a slightly loose volunteering paragraph, and future research aims that could be sharpened with a clearer question.
Subject motivation
I could not work out why a rule so favourable to insurers had survived
You open with a real intellectual puzzle rather than a declaration of passion, and it carries naturally into your dissertation and future plans. This gives the statement a coherent thread. Your motivation reads as earned through study and work, which is exactly what a reader looking for sustained interest wants to see.
Academic preparation
compared the old avoidance-or-nothing remedy for non-disclosure with the proportionate remedies
Your dissertation is well chosen and accurately described, and you name relevant LLB modules with a concrete link from agency to broking practice. You could briefly indicate your sources or method beyond Law Commission materials, since you later admit relying on commentary. That would show postgraduate readiness more directly.
Evidence and reflection
I would now want to test that argument against decided cases rather than commentary alone
This is genuine reflection: you identify a limitation in your own work and say how you would address it. The insight about reform as negotiation between market practice and doctrinal tidiness is also thoughtful. Both show critical maturity rather than generic claims about having developed research skills.
Relevant experience
My role is administrative rather than technical: I log notifications, chase loss adjusters
Your honesty about the role's limits makes the examples more convincing. The unoccupancy and single-occurrence disputes show you noticing legal questions within ordinary tasks. The Enterprise Act link works well because you explain what prompted it. You might say briefly what your reading on late payment led you to think.
Credibility and voice
I do not make those decisions, but I read the correspondence
Your voice is measured and believable throughout, and you avoid overstating authority in both work and volunteering. The caring responsibility is mentioned plainly and tied to study habits without seeking sympathy. The tone suits a graduate professional moving into advanced study.
Structure and format
Outside work, I volunteer twice a month at a community advice drop-in
The structure moves logically from interest to study, work, wider life and aims. The volunteering paragraph is the weakest link because its skills are only loosely connected to insurance law. Tightening it would free space for detail on your research method or intended dissertation question.
What you’ve done well
- Your dissertation discussion shows real analysis of the Insurance Act 2015 remedies and an honest awareness of its limits.
- You turn an administrative claims role into strong evidence by identifying specific construction disputes you observed.
How this draft could improve
- Add a sentence on how you researched your dissertation, such as the case law or sources you used, to show methodological readiness.
- Frame your proposed dissertation as a sharper question about how courts have applied fair presentation, rather than a broad topic.
- Shorten the volunteering paragraph or link its questioning and explanation skills more directly to coverage or disputes work.