- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 602 words
- File format: Text
Personal statement example
My interest in international trade law grew out of a contract law seminar in my second year, where we spent a session on the practical question of which law governs a sale of goods when the parties have chosen neither a forum nor a governing law. What struck me was how much commercial certainty depends on rules that most people never see. I began reading around the topic, first the CISG and then the WTO agreements, and found that the questions I most wanted to pursue were the ones about how trade rules are enforced rather than how they are drafted.
My LLB gave me the foundation for this. Public international law introduced me to sources, treaty interpretation and the limits of state consent, while EU law showed me a regime where trade obligations are unusually well policed. Comparing the two was the starting point for my dissertation, which looked at dispute settlement provisions in a sample of regional trade agreements and asked why so many of them are used rarely or not at all. I read the texts closely, gathered what publicly available information I could about cases brought under them, and argued that political sensitivity and the absence of standing institutions matter more than the wording of the clauses themselves. Working on it taught me how to handle primary treaty material carefully and how to resist tidy conclusions when the evidence is thin. It also left me with questions I could not answer in eleven thousand words, particularly about how the current difficulties at the WTO Appellate Body are changing states' calculations about where to bring disputes.
Outside my studies I have worked throughout my degree. For two years I had weekend shifts at a garden centre, which taught me to be quick, polite and accurate when several people need something at once. Since graduating I have been working on the customer service desk of a freight forwarding company, dealing mainly with documentation queries: customers asking why a certificate of origin has been rejected, what a commodity code means for duty, or why a consignment is held pending paperwork. I am not a specialist and I pass anything technical to colleagues, but the job has changed how I read the subject. Rules of origin looked abstract in a textbook; they look very different when a small exporter is trying to establish that their product qualifies for preferential treatment and cannot find the supplier declarations. I have become much more interested in the administrative and compliance side of trade regulation as a result.
I also volunteer at a student-run advice drop-in, mostly taking initial details and explaining what we can and cannot help with. Sitting in on sessions taught me to listen for the question behind the question, which is a habit I expect to be useful in any advisory work.
For postgraduate study I want to build depth in three areas: the WTO's substantive disciplines, particularly subsidies and trade remedies; the law of investment protection and its relationship with trade agreements; and the practical machinery of customs and market access. I would like the chance to write a longer dissertation, possibly developing my undergraduate work into a study of how post-Brexit UK agreements handle dispute settlement compared with their EU counterparts. In the longer term I hope to work in trade compliance or regulatory advisory work, ideally for clients who do not have large in-house teams. My year in freight has convinced me that the demand is real and that the gap between the rules and the people bound by them is where the interesting work lies.
Why this example works — strengths and ways to improve
This is a focused, credible draft. Your motivation, dissertation and freight work connect naturally to trade enforcement and compliance, and your reflection is honest rather than inflated. The main weaknesses are a generic garden centre and volunteering section, a dissertation method that stays vague, and a closing plan that could be sharper about what advanced study will add.
Subject motivation
the questions I most wanted to pursue were the ones about how trade rules are enforced
You trace your interest from a specific seminar problem to independent reading, then narrow it to enforcement rather than drafting. That progression is convincing because it shows your thinking developing, not just enthusiasm. The enforcement focus also runs through the rest of the statement, which gives it coherence.
Academic preparation
asked why so many of them are used rarely or not at all
The dissertation question is genuinely analytical and fits an LLM-level interest. However, 'a sample of regional trade agreements' leaves the method vague. Naming roughly how many agreements, how you chose them, or what counted as use would show more rigour without adding many words.
Evidence and reflection
how to resist tidy conclusions when the evidence is thin
This is real methodological reflection, not a generic skill claim. It acknowledges the limits of your data, which suits advanced study. Your unanswered question about the Appellate Body is a strong bridge forward. A brief note on what thin evidence actually looked like would strengthen it further.
Relevant experience
Rules of origin looked abstract in a textbook
The freight desk work is excellent evidence. It is ordinary, concrete and clearly reshaped how you read the subject. By contrast, the garden centre and drop-in paragraphs rely on familiar claims such as being 'quick, polite and accurate' and listening for 'the question behind the question'. These could be cut or compressed.
Credibility and voice
I am not a specialist and I pass anything technical to colleagues
This candour helps your credibility. You avoid exaggerating your authority and still explain what the role taught you. The voice is measured and plausible for a recent graduate throughout. Keep this restraint, because it makes your interest in compliance work more believable.
Structure and format
I would like the chance to write a longer dissertation
The order is logical, moving from motivation to degree, work and aims, and the prose is economical. The final paragraph lists three areas well but does not connect them clearly to the proposed post-Brexit dissertation. The stray 'Personal statement example' heading should be removed.
What you’ve done well
- Your freight forwarding role turns rules of origin and documentation queries into evidence of how trade law affects small exporters.
- Your dissertation reflection admits its limits and generates a precise follow-on question rather than a tidy conclusion.
- Your future aim of compliance work for clients without in-house teams follows directly from your experience.
How this draft could improve
- Specify your dissertation method briefly: the number of agreements, your selection basis, and how you measured use.
- Cut or merge the garden centre and drop-in paragraphs, keeping only a detail that adds something the freight role does not.
- For a real application, tailor the three study areas to the actual programme and explain how they serve the proposed dissertation and your compliance goal.