- Reading time: 3 minutes
- Price: Free download
- Published: 16th September 2026
- Word count: 853 words
- File format: Text
Why do you want to study this course or subject?
My interest began with a problem rather than an experience. In a Religious Studies lesson on world faiths we were given a single page on Buddhism, which said that Buddhists believe there is no self. I could not work out what that was supposed to mean in practice, so I borrowed Rupert Gethin's The Foundations of Buddhism from the county library, mostly expecting to confirm what the textbook said. Instead I found a tradition that argues with itself: careful distinctions between what the earliest texts claim, what later Abhidharma writers systematised, and what modern readers assume. The idea that anattā is an analysis of experience into changing processes, rather than a flat denial that anyone exists, was far more interesting than the summary I had been given, and it made me suspicious of every neat summary since. What holds my attention now is the gap between a text and its readers. The Pali canon was preserved orally, written down centuries after the Buddha, and reaches me through English translators who each make choices about words like dukkha and dhamma. I want to study that transmission properly rather than guess at it: how Buddhist ideas travelled into Tibet, China and Japan and were reshaped by local practice, and how far institutions, patronage and monastic rules shaped doctrine. I would also like to learn Pali or Sanskrit, because at the moment I am entirely dependent on other people's decisions about meaning. A degree in Buddhist studies appeals because it treats religion as something to be read historically and philosophically at once, which is exactly the combination I have been reaching for on my own with limited materials.
How have your qualifications and studies helped you to prepare?
My A levels have given me complementary tools. Religious Studies has the most obvious overlap: our philosophy unit on arguments about personal identity and life after death gave me vocabulary for thinking about rebirth without a permanent soul, and the ethics teaching helped me see why intention matters so much in Buddhist moral thought. For coursework I compared Christian and Buddhist responses to suffering, which forced me to stop treating dukkha as a synonym for pain and to explain conditioned arising in my own words. History has been just as useful. A unit on the Mughal empire taught me to weigh sources by who produced them and why, and to be wary of court chronicles written to flatter a patron. I now apply that instinct to hagiographies of Buddhist teachers, which serve purposes beyond recording facts. English Literature trained the close reading I rely on most: analysing metaphor and structure in poetry is not far from noticing that a verse in the Dhammapada uses a simile of a cartwheel and a footprint rather than an abstract statement. I have also worked at my study habits. Without a specialist teacher to ask, I keep a notebook of terms in Pali and Sanskrit with the differing English renderings I meet, and I check unfamiliar claims against more than one source before accepting them. My college's essay clinic helped me tighten my writing, and I am now much better at holding an argument to one clear line instead of listing everything I know.
What else have you done to prepare outside of education, and why are these experiences useful?
Because there is no temple or Buddhist society near me, I set up a small project of my own. Over eight months I have been comparing four freely available English translations of the Dhammapada alongside the Pali text on an open digital archive, choosing about thirty verses and recording where translators diverge. I write up each one on a simple blog: what the differences are, what a glossary suggests the terms can carry, and which reading seems best supported. Verse comparisons around the word citta were particularly stubborn, since 'mind', 'thought' and 'heart' pull the same line in different directions. The project has taught me patience, honest uncertainty, and how much a footnote can matter. Twice this year I have attended a lay meditation group that meets monthly in a community centre, mostly to listen. I am not a practitioner and have not pretended to be one, but hearing people discuss the five precepts in relation to ordinary work and family decisions showed me a living tradition rather than a textbook one. My Saturday job in a charity bookshop involves sorting donations and serving customers, and I have learnt to explain things briefly to people who have not read what I have read. Looking after my younger cousins two afternoons a week means my study time is planned rather than spontaneous, which has made me disciplined about reading in short, focused stretches. These commitments are not glamorous, but they have given me the steadiness that independent study demands, and I am looking forward to working with teachers, languages and libraries instead of improvising.
This example has 4,730 characters across the three answers. Use it for ideas and structure. Your own UCAS answers must fit within 4,000 characters in total, including spaces.
Review this personal statement
Latest reviews
There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.